Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.6 27B

NVIDIA · released

Wins 1 of 7 areas

Following instructions

Alibaba · released

Wins 5 of 7 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Math · Long documents

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger all-rounder.Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is cheaper and better at following instructions.

Scores updated · 25 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B$0.30 to read · $0.90 to write$1.20Price from Artificial Analysis
Qwen3.6 27B$0.60 to read · $3.60 to write$4.20Price from Artificial Analysis

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B costs 71% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3.6 27B pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+37.7points aheadQwen3.6 27B50.7Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B13
  • Fixes real GitHub issues in many programming languagesSWE-bench Multilingual+25.5points aheadQwen3.6 27B71.3Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B45.8
  • Fixes real GitHub issues in Python projectsSWE-bench Verified+23.5points aheadQwen3.6 27B77.2Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B53.7

Where Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B pulls ahead

  • Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+4.7points aheadNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B24.3Qwen3.6 27B19.6
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+3.9points aheadNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B71.5Qwen3.6 27B67.6
  • Research-level physics problemsCritPt+2points aheadNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B3.1Qwen3.6 27B1.1

Every test, side by side

All 25 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingQwen3.6 27B

Full coding ranking

AgentsQwen3.6 27B

Full agents ranking

ReasoningQwen3.6 27B

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

MathQwen3.6 27B

Full math ranking

Long documentsQwen3.6 27B
  • AA-LCRQwen3.6 27B by 11.665.777.3+11.6

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
  • IFBenchNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B by 3.971.567.6+3.9

Full following instructions ranking

Other results8 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B wins five of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, math and long documents. Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B wins following instructions, and costs 71% less. They are level on facts.

Which is better for coding?

Qwen3.6 27B. It wins 5 of the 5 coding tests both models report; Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.60 and $3.60. That makes Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B about 71% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 25 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 17 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 8 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.