Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.7 Max
Wins 0 of 7 areas
—
Wins 4 of 7 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts
Qwen3.7 Max wins more areas, narrowly.Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is cheaper.
Both rank among the ten best models we track in following instructions.
Scores updated · 41 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software09Qwen3.7 Max9 of 9 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking05Qwen3.7 Max5 of 5 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up03Qwen3.7 Max3 of 3 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own13Qwen3.7 Max3 of 4 tests
- MathCompetition and research-level math22Even2 each
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts00Even0 each · 1 tie
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked00Even0 each · 2 ties
Long documents rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B costs 67% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen3.7 Max pulls ahead
- Multi-step tasks using many real software toolsMCP Atlas+31.7points ahead
- Common-sense trick questionsSimpleBench+28.7points ahead
- Short factual questions, answered correctlySimpleQA Verified+23.4points ahead
Where Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B pulls ahead
- Fresh competition math problemsLiveBench · Mathematics+3.4points ahead
- Customer-service tasks in a simulated bankτ-Bench V3 · Banking+2.4points ahead
- Olympiad math problems with short answersIMOAnswerBench+2.3points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 41 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingQwen3.7 Max
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Qwen3.7 Max by 20.653.974.5+20.6
- Terminal-Bench HardQwen3.7 Max by 14.436.450.8+14.4
- SWE-bench ProQwen3.7 Max by 10.949.760.6+10.9
- SWE-bench MultilingualQwen3.7 Max by 10.667.778.3+10.6
- SWE-bench VerifiedQwen3.7 Max by 9.770.780.4+9.7
- SciCodeQwen3.7 Max by 9.240.349.5+9.2
- LiveBench · Agentic CodingQwen3.7 Max by 4.938.743.6+4.9
- LiveBench · CodingQwen3.7 Max by 3.570.774.2+3.5
- LiveCodeBench v6Qwen3.7 Max by 2.68991.6+2.6
AgentsQwen3.7 Max
- MCP AtlasQwen3.7 Max by 31.744.776.4+31.7
- GDPValQwen3.7 Max by 5.725.731.4+5.7
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B by 2.414.211.8+2.4
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Qwen3.7 Max by 10.51.5+1
ReasoningQwen3.7 Max
- SimpleBenchQwen3.7 Max by 28.741.770.4+28.7
- Humanity's Last ExamQwen3.7 Max by 12.128.440.5+12.1
- CritPtQwen3.7 Max by 10.33.113.4+10.3
- LiveBench · ReasoningQwen3.7 Max by 8.674.783.3+8.6
- GPQA DiamondQwen3.7 Max by 5.686.792.3+5.6
FactsQwen3.7 Max
- SimpleQA VerifiedQwen3.7 Max by 23.432.455.8+23.4
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyQwen3.7 Max by 8.522.631.1+8.5
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationQwen3.7 Max by 4.170.374.4+4.1
MathEven
- HMMT Feb. 2026Qwen3.7 Max by 18.378.897.1+18.3
- LiveBench · MathematicsNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B by 3.488.785.3+3.4
- AIME 2026Qwen3.7 Max by 2.894.297+2.8
- IMOAnswerBenchNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B by 2.392.390+2.3
Following instructionsEven
- IFBenchtie81.480.5tie
- LiveBench · Instruction Followingtie73.574tie
Other results13 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- livebench_data_analysisQwen3.7 Max by 17.354.571.8+17.3
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexQwen3.7 Max by 16.749.366+16.7
- HLE (with tools)Qwen3.7 Max by 16.137.453.5+16.1
- Toolathlon VerifiedQwen3.7 Max by 15.434.349.7+15.4
- AA-OmniscienceQwen3.7 Max by 13.9-0.413.5+13.9
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Qwen3.7 Max by 11.483.394.7+11.4
- Finance Agent v2Qwen3.7 Max by 10.937.548.4+10.9
- livebench_languageQwen3.7 Max by 8.970.879.7+8.9
- AA IntelligenceQwen3.7 Max by 6.622.929.5+6.6
- MMLU-ProXQwen3.7 Max by 48387+4
- MMLU-ProQwen3.7 Max by 2.886.889.6+2.8
- AA Agentic IndexQwen3.7 Max by 2.221.723.9+2.2
- WMT24++Qwen3.7 Max by 2.183.785.8+2.1
Questions people ask
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B or Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max wins four of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning and facts. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B wins none, but costs 67% less. They are level on math, long documents and following instructions.
Which is better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Max. It wins 9 of the 9 coding tests both models report; Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.70 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max costs $2.50 and $7.50. That makes Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B about 67% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 41 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 28 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 13 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.