Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16 vs Qwen3.5 35B A3B

NVIDIA · released

Wins 3 of 5 areas

Coding · Reasoning · Images and charts

Alibaba · released

Wins 1 of 5 areas

Following instructions

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16 is the stronger all-rounder.Qwen3.5 35B A3B is better at following instructions.

Scores updated · 16 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Images and charts and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16No current price is tracked.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B$0.25 to read · $2.00 to write$2.25Price from Alibaba's own price page

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16 pulls ahead

  • Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+19.9points aheadNVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF1660.7Qwen3.5 35B A3B40.8
  • Finds hard-to-locate facts by browsing the webBrowseComp+17points aheadNVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF1678Qwen3.5 35B A3B61
  • Recent programming contest problemsLiveCodeBench v6+13.6points aheadNVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF1688.2Qwen3.5 35B A3B74.6

Where Qwen3.5 35B A3B pulls ahead

  • Completes tasks by operating a computer desktopOSWorld-Verified+3.4points aheadQwen3.5 35B A3B54.5NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF1651.1
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+1.6points aheadQwen3.5 35B A3B72.5NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF1670.9

Every test, side by side

All 16 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingNVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16

Full coding ranking

AgentsEven

Full agents ranking

ReasoningNVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
  • CritPtNVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16 by 1010.90.9+10
  • GPQA DiamondNVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16 by 589.584.5+5

Full reasoning ranking

Images and chartsNVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16
  • CharXiv (RQ)NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16 by 3.380.877.5+3.3

Full images and charts ranking

Following instructionsQwen3.5 35B A3B
  • IFBenchQwen3.5 35B A3B by 1.670.972.5+1.6

Full following instructions ranking

Other results5 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

  • BabyVisionQwen3.5 35B A3B by 8.829.638.4+8.8
  • WMT24++NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16 by 8.584.876.3+8.5
  • MATH-VisionQwen3.5 35B A3B by 5.778.283.9+5.7
  • MMLU-ProXQwen3.5 35B A3B by 4.176.981+4.1
  • MMlongBench DocNVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16 by 3.362.859.5+3.3

Questions people ask

Which is better, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16 or Qwen3.5 35B A3B?

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16 wins three of the five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning and images and charts. Qwen3.5 35B A3B wins following instructions. They are level on agents.

Which is better for coding?

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Super-VL-120B-A12B-BF16. It wins 5 of the 5 coding tests both models report; Qwen3.5 35B A3B wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 16 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.