Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning

NVIDIA · released

Wins 0 of 7 areas

—

Alibaba · released

Wins 7 of 7 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning is the stronger all-rounder.NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL is cheaper.

Scores updated · 20 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL$0.20 to read · $0.60 to write$0.80Price from Artificial Analysis
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning$0.20 to read · $2.40 to write$2.60Price from Alibaba's own price page

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL costs 69% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning pulls ahead

  • Completes tasks by operating a computer desktopOSWorld-Verified+19.5points aheadQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning30.6NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL11.1
  • Reasoning about charts from research papersCharXiv (RQ)+15.3points aheadQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning56.6NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL41.3
  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+14.8points aheadQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning72NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL57.2

Where NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 20 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning

Full coding ranking

AgentsQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning
  • OSWorld-VerifiedQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning by 19.511.130.6+19.5
  • GDPValQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning by 8.308.3+8.3

Full agents ranking

ReasoningQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning

Full reasoning ranking

FactsQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning
  • CharXiv (RQ)Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning by 15.341.356.6+15.3
  • MMMU-ProQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning by 8.952.961.8+8.9
  • MathVistaQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning by 6.475.581.9+6.4

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning
  • AA-LCRQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning by 1.74142.7+1.7

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning
  • IFBenchQwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning by 13.231.945.1+13.2

Full following instructions ranking

Other results6 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning wins all seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL wins none, but costs 69% less.

Which is better for coding?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning. It wins 1 of the 2 coding tests both models report; NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL wins none, and 1 is a tie.

Which is cheaper?

NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning costs $0.20 and $2.40. That makes NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL about 69% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 20 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 14 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 6 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.