Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning)

Anthropic · released

Wins 2 of 7 areas

Coding · Facts

Google · released

Wins 5 of 7 areas

Agents · Reasoning · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning) is the stronger all-rounder.Claude 3.7 Sonnet is better at coding.

Scores updated · 17 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet$3.00 to read · $15.00 to write$18Price from Artificial Analysis
Gemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning)No current price is tracked.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Gemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning) pulls ahead

  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+19.3points aheadGemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning)71Claude 3.7 Sonnet51.7
  • Harder college exam questions with imagesMMMU-Pro+13points aheadGemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning)73.1Claude 3.7 Sonnet60.1
  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+4.1points aheadGemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning)13.8Claude 3.7 Sonnet9.7

Where Claude 3.7 Sonnet pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+49.9points aheadClaude 3.7 Sonnet60Gemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning)10.1
  • Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+4.5points aheadClaude 3.7 Sonnet21.2Gemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning)16.7

Every test, side by side

All 17 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingClaude 3.7 Sonnet

Full coding ranking

AgentsGemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning)
  • GDPValGemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning) by 1.127.428.5+1.1

Full agents ranking

ReasoningGemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning)

Full reasoning ranking

FactsClaude 3.7 Sonnet

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsGemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning)
  • MMMU-ProGemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning) by 1360.173.1+13
  • LMArena · VisionGemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning) by 85 rating points11691254+85 rating

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsGemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning)
  • AA-LCRGemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning) by 19.351.771+19.3

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsGemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning)
  • IFBenchGemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning) by 448.352.3+4

Full following instructions ranking

Other results5 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning)?

Gemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning) wins five of the seven areas where both have results: agents, reasoning, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins coding and facts.

Which is better for coding?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet. It wins 1 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Gemini 2.5 Flash (Sep) (Non-Reasoning) wins none, and 1 is a tie.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 17 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 12 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.