VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC
Refresh Models Deals Regulatory Sources

Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo V2.6 Flash RL

8 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 8 shared benchmarks, Claude Fable 5 scores higher on 5 and MiMo V2.6 Flash RL on 3. The widest gap is Program Bench, where Claude Fable 5 scores 86.3 against 26. MiMo V2.6 Flash RL is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.14 against $10.00 per million input tokens).

ANTHROPICVSXIAOMI8 SHARED53 HEAD-TO-HEADNEWEST SCORE ADDED

At a glance

MakerAnthropicXiaomi
Released
Price per 1M tokens input / output$10.00 / $50.00$0.14 / $0.28
Cost of 1M in + 1M out$60.00$0.42 142.9× less
Head-to-head of 8 shared benchmarks5 wins3 wins
Scores tracked independently verified154 299 0

Release dates: Artificial Analysis for Claude Fable 5; the Hugging Face repository date for MiMo V2.6 Flash RL. Prices: Anthropic's own price page for Claude Fable 5; deepinfra for MiMo V2.6 Flash RL. ◆ = independently verified score.

Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins

AreaClaude Fable 5WINSMiMo V2.6 Flash RL
Coding01MiMo V2.6 Flash RL leads 1 of 1
Agentic10Claude Fable 5 leads 1 of 1 · widest: OSWorld-Verified 85 vs 80.8

Biggest gaps

Claude Fable 5 pulls furthest ahead on

  1. OSWorld-Verified85 vs 80.8

MiMo V2.6 Flash RL pulls furthest ahead on

No ratified-area lead of 3 points or more.

Every shared benchmark8 · grouped by area

Other shared benchmarks 6

JobBench57.461.2
Terminal-Bench 4.037.328.8

Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (anthropic-official, deepinfra), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.

Compare Claude Fable 5 withALL PAIRINGS →