Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3.5 2B?

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 2B

22 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 22 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on 22 and Qwen3.5 2B on 0. The widest gap is scicode, where Claude Opus 4.6 scores 52 against 7.2.

ANTHROPICVSALIBABA22 SHARED22–0 HEAD-TO-HEAD

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6MARGINQwen3.5 2B

AA Agentic Index67.60.8

AA Intelligence386.9

AA-LCR7825.6

AA-Omniscience13.7-60.2

AIME 202599.819

Artificial Analysis Coding Index48.12.9

critpt12.60

gdpval55.90

GPQA Diamond91.351.6

HLE53.15

IFBench62.541.3

MMLU-Pro89.166.5

mmmlu91.163.1

MMMU-Pro77.343

multichallenge5633.7

OmniScience Accuracy478.1

OmniScience Non-Hallucination37.225.8

RealWorldQA73.965.1

scicode527.2

Terminal-Bench Hard65.43.8

τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)99.381.6

τ³-Bench72.46.2

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing.

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 withALL PAIRINGS →

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.8 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet Claude Fable 5 Claude Opus 4.5 Claude Opus 5

Across the fieldQwen3.6 27B Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.8 Max Preview Qwen3.7 Plus Preview Claude Opus 4 Qwen3.5 4B Gemini 3.6 Flash Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Compare Qwen3.5 2B withALL PAIRINGS →

AlibabaQwen3.5 35B A3B Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B A17B Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B Qwen3.5 27B Qwen3.6 Plus

Across the fieldClaude Sonnet 4.5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet Gemini 3 Pro Claude Fable 5 GPT-5 Claude Opus 4.5 DeepSeek-V4-Pro DeepSeek-V3