Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct

DeepSeek · released

Wins 4 of 5 areas

Coding · Reasoning · Long documents · Following instructions

Alibaba · released

Wins 0 of 5 areas

—

DeepSeek-V3.2 is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 21 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

DeepSeek-V3.2$0.28 to read · $0.42 to write$0.70Price from Artificial Analysis
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct$1.50 to read · $7.50 to write$9.00Price from Alibaba's own price page

DeepSeek-V3.2 costs 92% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where DeepSeek-V3.2 pulls ahead

  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+27.6points aheadDeepSeek-V3.273.3Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct45.7
  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+22.2points aheadDeepSeek-V3.284Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct61.8
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+20.2points aheadDeepSeek-V3.260.7Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct40.5

Where Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+37.8points aheadQwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct55.1DeepSeek-V3.217.3
  • Long, multi-file coding tasks in real codebasesSWE-bench Pro+23.1points aheadQwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct38.7DeepSeek-V3.215.6

Every test, side by side

All 21 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingDeepSeek-V3.2

Full coding ranking

ReasoningDeepSeek-V3.2

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

Long documentsDeepSeek-V3.2
  • AA-LCRDeepSeek-V3.2 by 27.673.345.7+27.6

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsDeepSeek-V3.2
  • IFBenchDeepSeek-V3.2 by 20.260.740.5+20.2

Full following instructions ranking

Other results8 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3.2 or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V3.2 wins four of the five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, long documents and following instructions. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct wins none. They are level on facts.

Which is better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2. It wins 5 of the 6 coding tests both models report; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct wins 1.

Which is cheaper?

DeepSeek-V3.2 costs $0.28 per million input tokens and $0.42 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs $1.50 and $7.50. That makes DeepSeek-V3.2 about 92% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 21 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 8 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.