Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Muse Spark Open

DeepSeek · released

Wins 2 of 7 areas

Agents · Long documents

Meta · released

Wins 3 of 7 areas

Facts · Images and charts · Math

Muse Spark Open wins more areas, narrowly.DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is cheaper and better at agents.

Scores updated · 16 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash$0.30 to read · $1.20 to write$1.50Price from Artificial Analysis
Muse Spark Open$1.25 to read · $4.25 to write$5.50Price from Artificial Analysis

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash costs 73% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.

Where Muse Spark Open pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+72.4points aheadMuse Spark Open75.9DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash3.5
  • Short factual questions, answered correctlySimpleQA Verified+13.7points aheadMuse Spark Open56.6DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash42.9
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+6.5points aheadMuse Spark Open58.4DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash51.9

Where DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash pulls ahead

  • Complex command-line tasks across many fieldsTerminal-Bench 4.0+18.7points aheadDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash26.8Muse Spark Open8.1
  • Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+14.2points aheadDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash90.6Muse Spark Open76.4
  • Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+9.9points aheadDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash55Muse Spark Open45.1

Every test, side by side

All 16 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingEven

Full coding ranking

AgentsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash by 18.726.88.1+18.7
  • GDPValDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash by 9.95545.1+9.9

Full agents ranking

ReasoningEven

Full reasoning ranking

FactsMuse Spark Open

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsMuse Spark Open
  • MMMU-ProMuse Spark Open by 3.97780.9+3.9

Full images and charts ranking

MathMuse Spark Open

Full math ranking

Long documentsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
  • AA-LCRDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash by 5.78478.3+5.7

Full long documents ranking

Other results2 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open wins three of the seven areas where both have results: facts, images and charts and math. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash wins agents and long documents, and costs 73% less. They are level on coding and reasoning.

Which is better for coding?

Neither. They win 1 coding test each of the 2 both models report.

Which is cheaper?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. That makes DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash about 73% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 16 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 14 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.