EXAONE 4.0 32B vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Wins 4 of 5 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Long documents · Following instructions
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 18 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking03Gemini 2.5 Pro3 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software02Gemini 2.5 Pro2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01Gemini 2.5 Pro1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01Gemini 2.5 Pro1 of 1 test
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 2.5 Pro pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+54.3points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+25.2points ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+22.7points ahead
Where EXAONE 4.0 32B pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+5.1points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 18 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 2.5 Pro
- Terminal-Bench HardGemini 2.5 Pro by 22.73.826.5+22.7
- SciCodeGemini 2.5 Pro by 11.934.446.3+11.9
ReasoningGemini 2.5 Pro
- GPQA DiamondGemini 2.5 Pro by 9.773.983.6+9.7
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 2.5 Pro by 6.611.418+6.6
- CritPtGemini 2.5 Pro by 2.602.6+2.6
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 2.5 Pro by 25.213.939+25.2
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationEXAONE 4.0 32B by 5.114.29.1+5.1
Following instructionsGemini 2.5 Pro
- IFBenchGemini 2.5 Pro by 12.436.348.7+12.4
Other results9 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 2.5 Pro by 43.8-60.1-16.4+43.8
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Gemini 2.5 Pro by 36.817.354.1+36.8
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemini 2.5 Pro by 32.71446.7+32.7
- AA IntelligenceGemini 2.5 Pro by 6.88.215+6.8
- LiveCodeBenchEXAONE 4.0 32B by 6.780.974.2+6.7
- AA Agentic IndexEXAONE 4.0 32B by 69.53.5+6
- livecodebench_hardGemini 2.5 Pro by 3.156.359.4+3.1
- livecodebench_mediumGemini 2.5 Pro by 2.388.390.6+2.3
- livecodebench_easytie98.898.8tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, EXAONE 4.0 32B or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins four of the five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, long documents and following instructions. EXAONE 4.0 32B wins none. They are level on facts.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; EXAONE 4.0 32B wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 18 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 9 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 9 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.