Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Granite 4.0 Micro
Wins 5 of 6 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 6 areas
—
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 22 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Gemini 2.5 Pro3 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Gemini 2.5 Pro2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Gemini 2.5 Pro2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Gemini 2.5 Pro1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Gemini 2.5 Pro1 of 1 test
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own00Even0 each · 1 tie
Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 2.5 Pro pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+62points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+50points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+34.4points ahead
Where Granite 4.0 Micro pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 22 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 2.5 Pro
- SciCodeGemini 2.5 Pro by 34.446.311.9+34.4
- Terminal-Bench HardGemini 2.5 Pro by 2526.51.5+25
ReasoningGemini 2.5 Pro
- GPQA DiamondGemini 2.5 Pro by 5083.633.6+50
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 2.5 Pro by 13185+13
- CritPtGemini 2.5 Pro by 2.62.60+2.6
FactsGemini 2.5 Pro
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 2.5 Pro by 29.8399.3+29.8
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGemini 2.5 Pro by 4.99.14.2+4.9
Following instructionsGemini 2.5 Pro
- IFBenchGemini 2.5 Pro by 23.948.724.8+23.9
Other results12 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 2.5 Pro by 61.2-16.4-77.5+61.2
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemini 2.5 Pro by 41.746.75+41.7
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Gemini 2.5 Pro by 41.554.112.6+41.5
- MMLU-ProGemini 2.5 Pro by 41.38644.7+41.3
- XSTestGemini 2.5 Pro by 23.398.775.4+23.3
- bbqGemini 2.5 Pro by 21.296.475.2+21.2
- HarmBenchGranite 4.0 Micro by 20.965.486.3+20.9
- AA IntelligenceGemini 2.5 Pro by 9.9155.1+9.9
- AIR-Bench 2024Granite 4.0 Micro by 6.873.680.4+6.8
- simple_safety_testsGranite 4.0 Micro by 397100+3
- AA Agentic Indextie3.54.2tie
- anthropic_red_teamtie99.599.6tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Granite 4.0 Micro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins five of the six areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. Granite 4.0 Micro wins none. They are level on agents.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Granite 4.0 Micro wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 22 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.