Gemini 2.5 Pro vs MiniMax M1 80K
Wins 4 of 6 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Following instructions
Wins 1 of 6 areas
Agents
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.MiniMax M1 80K is cheaper and better at agents.
Scores updated · 30 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software30Gemini 2.5 Pro3 of 3 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Gemini 2.5 Pro3 of 3 tests
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked20Gemini 2.5 Pro2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up10Gemini 2.5 Pro1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own01MiniMax M1 80K1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts11Even1 each
Agents rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
MiniMax M1 80K costs 76% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 2.5 Pro pulls ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+23.5points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+16.6points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+13.9points ahead
Where MiniMax M1 80K pulls ahead
- Questions about very long textsLongBench v2+2.7points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 30 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 2.5 Pro
- Terminal-Bench HardGemini 2.5 Pro by 23.526.53+23.5
- SciCodeGemini 2.5 Pro by 8.946.337.4+8.9
- SWE-bench VerifiedGemini 2.5 Pro by 7.263.256+7.2
ReasoningGemini 2.5 Pro
- GPQA DiamondGemini 2.5 Pro by 13.983.669.7+13.9
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 2.5 Pro by 9.1188.9+9.1
- CritPtGemini 2.5 Pro by 2.62.60+2.6
FactsGemini 2.5 Pro
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 2.5 Pro by 16.63922.5+16.6
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationtie9.18.5tie
Long documentsEven
- AA-LCRGemini 2.5 Pro by 11.36957.7+11.3
- LongBench v2MiniMax M1 80K by 2.758.861.5+2.7
Following instructionsGemini 2.5 Pro
- Multi-ChallengeGemini 2.5 Pro by 8.953.644.7+8.9
- IFBenchGemini 2.5 Pro by 6.948.741.8+6.9
Other results17 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- SimpleQAGemini 2.5 Pro by 32.350.818.5+32.3
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 2.5 Pro by 32.2-16.4-48.5+32.2
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemini 2.5 Pro by 32.246.714.5+32.2
- AA Agentic IndexMiniMax M1 80K by 25.63.529.1+25.6
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Gemini 2.5 Pro by 19.954.134.2+19.9
- LiveCodeBench (24/8~25/5)Gemini 2.5 Pro by 12.177.165+12.1
- TAU-bench (airline)MiniMax M1 80K by 125062+12
- LiveCodeBenchGemini 2.5 Pro by 9.274.265+9.2
- AIME 2025Gemini 2.5 Pro by 6.18376.9+6.1
- AIME 2024Gemini 2.5 Pro by 69286+6
- MMLU-ProGemini 2.5 Pro by 4.98681.1+4.9
- ZebraLogicGemini 2.5 Pro by 4.891.686.8+4.8
- TAU-bench (retail)Gemini 2.5 Pro by 3.56763.5+3.5
- OpenAI-MRCR (128k)Gemini 2.5 Pro by 3.476.873.4+3.4
- AA IntelligenceGemini 2.5 Pro by 3.31511.7+3.3
- OpenAI-MRCR (1M)Gemini 2.5 Pro by 2.658.856.2+2.6
- MATH-500 (EM)Gemini 2.5 Pro by 298.896.8+2
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or MiniMax M1 80K?
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins four of the six areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts and following instructions. MiniMax M1 80K wins agents, and costs 76% less. They are level on long documents.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro. It wins 3 of the 3 coding tests both models report; MiniMax M1 80K wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 80K costs $0.55 and $2.20. That makes MiniMax M1 80K about 76% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 30 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 17 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.