Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
⌘K
UTC
Models741Deals30d271Policy30d66, 14 pendingSources1,015

GLM 5V Turbo vs Qwen3.7 Plus Preview

Z.ai · released

Wins 0 of 7 areas

—

Alibaba · released

Wins 5 of 7 areas

Coding · Reasoning · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions

Qwen3.7 Plus Preview is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 21 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

GLM 5V Turbo$1.20 to read · $4.00 to write$5.20Price from z-ai
Qwen3.7 Plus Preview$0.40 to read · $1.60 to write$2.00Price from Alibaba's own price page

Qwen3.7 Plus Preview costs 62% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3.7 Plus Preview pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+41.1points aheadQwen3.7 Plus Preview72.3GLM 5V Turbo31.2
  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+18.5points aheadQwen3.7 Plus Preview35.6GLM 5V Turbo17.1
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+16.9points aheadQwen3.7 Plus Preview78GLM 5V Turbo61.1

Where GLM 5V Turbo pulls ahead

  • Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+27.9points aheadGLM 5V Turbo41.4Qwen3.7 Plus Preview13.5
  • Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+6.8points aheadGLM 5V Turbo29.3Qwen3.7 Plus Preview22.5

Every test, side by side

All 21 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingQwen3.7 Plus Preview

Full coding ranking

AgentsEven

Full agents ranking

ReasoningQwen3.7 Plus Preview

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsQwen3.7 Plus Preview

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsQwen3.7 Plus Preview
  • AA-LCRQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 2.770.373+2.7

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsQwen3.7 Plus Preview
  • IFBenchQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 16.961.178+16.9

Full following instructions ranking

Other results8 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, GLM 5V Turbo or Qwen3.7 Plus Preview?

Qwen3.7 Plus Preview wins five of the seven areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. GLM 5V Turbo wins none. They are level on agents and facts.

Which is better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus Preview. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; GLM 5V Turbo wins none.

Which is cheaper?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus Preview costs $0.40 and $1.60. That makes Qwen3.7 Plus Preview about 62% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 21 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 8 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.