Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

GPT-5.6 Sol vs MiMo V2.6 Pro

OpenAI · released

Wins 3 of 6 areas

Agents · Reasoning · Images and charts

Xiaomi · released

Wins 2 of 6 areas

Coding · Long documents

GPT-5.6 Sol wins more areas, narrowly.MiMo V2.6 Pro is cheaper and better at coding.

Scores updated · 24 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Images and charts and long documents rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

GPT-5.6 Sol$4.00 to read · $20.00 to write$24Price from Artificial Analysis
MiMo V2.6 Pro$0.43 to read · $0.87 to write$1.30Price from Artificial Analysis

MiMo V2.6 Pro costs 95% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.

Where GPT-5.6 Sol pulls ahead

  • Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+24.5points aheadGPT-5.6 Sol59.4MiMo V2.6 Pro34.9
  • Research-level physics problemsCritPt+5.7points aheadGPT-5.6 Sol32.3MiMo V2.6 Pro26.6
  • Complex command-line tasks across many fieldsTerminal-Bench 4.0+5.1points aheadGPT-5.6 Sol39.9MiMo V2.6 Pro34.8

Where MiMo V2.6 Pro pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+51.6points aheadMiMo V2.6 Pro59.4GPT-5.6 Sol7.8
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+3.8points aheadMiMo V2.6 Pro60.9GPT-5.6 Sol57.1
  • Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+3.8points aheadMiMo V2.6 Pro59.2GPT-5.6 Sol55.4

Every test, side by side

All 24 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingMiMo V2.6 Pro

Full coding ranking

AgentsGPT-5.6 Sol
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0GPT-5.6 Sol by 5.139.934.8+5.1
  • GDPValMiMo V2.6 Pro by 3.855.459.2+3.8
  • OSWorld-VerifiedGPT-5.6 Sol by 18382+1

Full agents ranking

ReasoningGPT-5.6 Sol

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsGPT-5.6 Sol

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsMiMo V2.6 Pro
  • AA-LCRMiMo V2.6 Pro by 2.38486.3+2.3

Full long documents ranking

Other results12 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, GPT-5.6 Sol or MiMo V2.6 Pro?

GPT-5.6 Sol wins three of the six areas where both have results: agents, reasoning and images and charts. MiMo V2.6 Pro wins coding and long documents, and costs 95% less. They are level on facts.

Which is better for coding?

MiMo V2.6 Pro. It wins 2 of the 3 coding tests both models report; GPT-5.6 Sol wins none, and 1 is a tie.

Which is cheaper?

GPT-5.6 Sol costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; MiMo V2.6 Pro costs $0.43 and $0.87. That makes MiMo V2.6 Pro about 95% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 24 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 12 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.