MiMo V2 Omni vs Qwen3.7 Plus Preview
Wins 2 of 7 areas
Agents · Long documents
Wins 5 of 7 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Following instructions
Qwen3.7 Plus Preview is the stronger all-rounder.MiMo V2 Omni is better at agents.
Scores updated · 19 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software03Qwen3.7 Plus Preview3 of 3 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking03Qwen3.7 Plus Preview3 of 3 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02Qwen3.7 Plus Preview2 of 2 tests
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video02Qwen3.7 Plus Preview2 of 2 tests
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01Qwen3.7 Plus Preview1 of 1 test
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own10MiMo V2 Omni1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10MiMo V2 Omni1 of 1 test
Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Qwen3.7 Plus Preview costs 17% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen3.7 Plus Preview pulls ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+24.5points ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+21.2points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+13.5points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 19 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingQwen3.7 Plus Preview
- Terminal-Bench HardQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 12.234.847+12.2
- SciCodeQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 9.436.746.1+9.4
- SWE-bench VerifiedQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 2.974.877.7+2.9
ReasoningQwen3.7 Plus Preview
- Humanity's Last ExamQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 13.522.135.6+13.5
- CritPtQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 81.19.1+8
- GPQA DiamondQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 7.282.890+7.2
FactsQwen3.7 Plus Preview
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 21.251.172.3+21.2
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 3.219.322.5+3.2
Images and chartsQwen3.7 Plus Preview
- MMMU-ProQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 10.669.980.5+10.6
- LMArena · VisionQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 52 rating points12281280+52 rating
Following instructionsQwen3.7 Plus Preview
- IFBenchQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 24.553.578+24.5
Other results6 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA Agentic IndexMiMo V2 Omni by 38.958.619.7+38.9
- AA-OmniscienceQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 21.2-20.11.1+21.2
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 20.435.555.9+20.4
- Claw Eval (pass@3)Qwen3.7 Plus Preview by 7.954.862.7+7.9
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Qwen3.7 Plus Preview by 1.891.293+1.8
- AA IntelligenceQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 1.323.925.2+1.3
Questions people ask
Which is better, MiMo V2 Omni or Qwen3.7 Plus Preview?
Qwen3.7 Plus Preview wins five of the seven areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, images and charts and following instructions. MiMo V2 Omni wins agents and long documents.
Which is better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Plus Preview. It wins 3 of the 3 coding tests both models report; MiMo V2 Omni wins none.
Which is cheaper?
MiMo V2 Omni costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus Preview costs $0.40 and $1.60. That makes Qwen3.7 Plus Preview about 17% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 19 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 6 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.