Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Qwen3 Max (Reasoning)
Wins 1 of 7 areas
Agents
Wins 4 of 7 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Math · Long documents
Qwen3 Max (Reasoning) wins more areas, narrowly.Qwen3.5 35B A3B is cheaper and better at agents.
Scores updated · 33 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software13Qwen3 Max (Reasoning)3 of 4 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Qwen3 Max (Reasoning)2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts02Qwen3 Max (Reasoning)2 of 2 tests
- MathCompetition and research-level math01Qwen3 Max (Reasoning)1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own10Qwen3.5 35B A3B1 of 1 test
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked11Even1 each
Agents rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B costs 69% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen3 Max (Reasoning) pulls ahead
- Recent programming contest problemsLiveCodeBench v6+11.3points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+9.7points ahead
- Olympiad math problems with short answersIMOAnswerBench+7.1points ahead
Where Qwen3.5 35B A3B pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+9.3points ahead
- Finds hard-to-locate facts by browsing the webBrowseComp+7.1points ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+2.3points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 33 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingQwen3 Max (Reasoning)
- LiveCodeBench v6Qwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 11.374.685.9+11.3
- SWE-bench MultilingualQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 6.460.366.7+6.4
- SWE-bench VerifiedQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 6.169.275.3+6.1
- Terminal-Bench HardQwen3.5 35B A3B by 2.326.524.2+2.3
ReasoningQwen3 Max (Reasoning)
- Humanity's Last ExamQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 72128+7
- GPQA DiamondQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 1.684.586.1+1.6
- CritPttie0.91.7tie
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 9.720.129.8+9.7
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationQwen3.5 35B A3B by 9.314.65.3+9.3
MathQwen3 Max (Reasoning)
- IMOAnswerBenchQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 7.176.883.9+7.1
- AIME 2026tie93.393.3tie
Long documentsQwen3 Max (Reasoning)
- AA-LCRQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 2.37274.3+2.3
- LongBench v2Qwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 1.65960.6+1.6
Following instructionsEven
- Multi-ChallengeQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 3.36063.3+3.3
- IFBenchQwen3.5 35B A3B by 1.872.570.7+1.8
Other results17 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- Terminal-Bench 2.0Qwen3.5 35B A3B by 1840.522.5+18
- AA-OmniscienceQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 11.5-48.1-36.6+11.5
- VITA-BenchQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 931.940.9+9
- BrowseComp-ZHQwen3.5 35B A3B by 8.669.560.9+8.6
- MCPMarkQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 6.52733.5+6.5
- t2-benchQwen3.5 35B A3B by 6.481.274.8+6.4
- DeepPlanningQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 5.922.828.7+5.9
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Qwen3.5 35B A3B by 5.689.283.6+5.6
- Seal-0Qwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 5.541.446.9+5.5
- SuperGPQAQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 3.963.467.3+3.9
- C-EvalQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 3.590.293.7+3.5
- AA IntelligenceQwen3 Max (Reasoning) by 219.321.3+2
- MMMLUtie85.284.4tie
- WideSearchtie57.157.9tie
- MMLU-Reduxtie93.392.8tie
- BFCLv4tie67.367.7tie
- MMLU-Protie85.385.7tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Qwen3.5 35B A3B or Qwen3 Max (Reasoning)?
Qwen3 Max (Reasoning) wins four of the seven areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, math and long documents. Qwen3.5 35B A3B wins agents, and costs 69% less. They are level on facts and following instructions.
Which is better for coding?
Qwen3 Max (Reasoning). It wins 3 of the 4 coding tests both models report; Qwen3.5 35B A3B wins 1.
Which is cheaper?
Qwen3.5 35B A3B costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max (Reasoning) costs $1.20 and $6.00. That makes Qwen3.5 35B A3B about 69% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 33 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 16 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 17 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.