Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL Thinking (8B)
Wins 4 of 7 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Images and charts · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 7 areas
—
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins more areas, narrowly.
Scores updated · 51 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video60Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct6 of 6 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking20Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software21Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct2 of 3 tests
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct1 of 1 test
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own11Even1 each
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up00Even0 each · 2 ties
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts00Even0 each · 1 tie
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs 12% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct pulls ahead
- Completes tasks by operating a computer desktopOSWorld-Verified+32.8points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+14points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+13.3points ahead
Where Qwen3 VL Thinking (8B) pulls ahead
- Recent programming contest problemsLiveCodeBench v6+4.3points ahead
- Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+1.7points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 51 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
- SciCodeQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1435.921.9+14
- LiveCodeBench v6Qwen3 VL Thinking (8B) by 4.354.358.6+4.3
- Terminal-Bench HardQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 36.83.8+3
AgentsEven
- OSWorld-VerifiedQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 32.866.733.9+32.8
- GDPValQwen3 VL Thinking (8B) by 1.76.78.4+1.7
ReasoningQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
- GPQA DiamondQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 13.371.257.9+13.3
- Humanity's Last ExamQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 2.86.63.8+2.8
- CritPttie00.3tie
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationtie8.48.6tie
- AA-Omniscience · Accuracytie20.320.4tie
Images and chartsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
- MMMU-ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1167.656.6+11
- OCRBenchQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 10.19281.9+10.1
- CharXiv (RQ)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 9.162.153+9.1
- MathVistaQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 3.584.981.4+3.5
- MMStarQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 3.178.475.3+3.1
- BLINKQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 270.768.7+2
Following instructionsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
- IFBenchQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 2.842.739.9+2.8
Other results33 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- Arena-Hard-V2Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 26.377.451.1+26.3
- ScreenSpot-Pro (No tools)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 15.46246.6+15.4
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 12.635.122.5+12.6
- LVBenchQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 11.967.755.8+11.9
- IncludeQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 10.58069.5+10.5
- SuperGPQAQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 9.260.451.2+9.2
- MMLU-ProXQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 7.177.870.7+7.1
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 6.716.59.8+6.7
- CC-OCRQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 5.982.276.3+5.9
- RealWorldQAQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 5.879.373.5+5.8
- AIME 2025Qwen3 VL Thinking (8B) by 5.674.780.3+5.6
- CharadesSTAQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 4.964.859.9+4.9
- AI2DQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 4.889.784.9+4.8
- BFCL v3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 4.767.763+4.7
- IFEvalQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 4.687.883.2+4.6
- MMMU (val) (Pass@1)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 4.678.774.1+4.6
- ERQAQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 4.551.346.8+4.5
- MMLU-ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 4.581.877.3+4.5
- MATH-VisionQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 3.866.562.7+3.8
- AA Agentic IndexQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 3.519.115.6+3.5
- MMLU-ReduxQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 3.492.288.8+3.4
- HMMT 2025Qwen3 VL Thinking (8B) by 3.257.460.6+3.2
- InfoVQA_testQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 3.289.286+3.2
- OCRBench v2_enQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 3.267.163.9+3.2
- OCRBench v2 (Chinese)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 2.661.859.2+2.6
- SimpleQAQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 2.351.949.6+2.3
- HallusionBenchQwen3 VL Thinking (8B) by 2.263.265.4+2.2
- VideoMMMUQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1.974.772.8+1.9
- DocVQA_testQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1.897.195.3+1.8
- ScreenSpotQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1.895.493.6+1.8
- AA IntelligenceQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1.79.98.2+1.7
- MM MTBenchtie8.58tie
- AA-Omnisciencetie-52.7-52.3tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct or Qwen3 VL Thinking (8B)?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins four of the seven areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, images and charts and following instructions. Qwen3 VL Thinking (8B) wins none. They are level on agents, facts and long documents.
Which is better for coding?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct. It wins 2 of the 3 coding tests both models report; Qwen3 VL Thinking (8B) wins 1.
Which is cheaper?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL Thinking (8B) costs $0.18 and $2.10. That makes Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct about 12% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 51 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 18 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 33 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.