Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning

Alibaba · released

Wins 7 of 7 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions

Alibaba · released

Wins 0 of 7 areas

—

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning is the stronger all-rounder.Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning is cheaper.

Scores updated · 48 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning$0.40 to read · $4.00 to write$4.40Price from Alibaba's own price page
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning$0.20 to read · $2.40 to write$2.60Price from Alibaba's own price page

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning costs 41% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning pulls ahead

  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+21points aheadQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning63.7Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning42.7
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+11.4points aheadQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning56.5Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning45.1
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+11.1points aheadQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning39.9Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning28.8

Where Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 48 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning

Full coding ranking

AgentsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning

Full agents ranking

ReasoningQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning

Full reasoning ranking

FactsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning
  • CharXiv (RQ)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 9.566.156.6+9.5
  • MMMU-ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 6.968.761.8+6.9
  • Video-MMEQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 5.77973.3+5.7
  • MathVistaQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 3.985.881.9+3.9
  • OCRBenchQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 3.687.583.9+3.6
  • MMStarQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 3.278.775.5+3.2
  • BLINKQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 1.767.165.4+1.7

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning
  • AA-LCRQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 2163.742.7+21

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning
  • IFBenchQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 11.456.545.1+11.4

Full following instructions ranking

Other results30 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning wins all seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning wins none, but costs 41% less.

Which is better for coding?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning. It wins 3 of the 3 coding tests both models report; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning costs $0.20 and $2.40. That makes Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Reasoning about 41% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 48 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 18 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 30 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.