Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Reasoning

Alibaba · released

Wins 0 of 7 areas

—

Alibaba · released

Wins 6 of 7 areas

Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions

Qwen3 VL 32B Reasoning is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 48 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct$0.16 to read · $0.64 to write$0.80Price from Alibaba's own price page
Qwen3 VL 32B Reasoning$0.16 to read · $0.64 to write$0.80Price from Alibaba's own price page

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3 VL 32B Reasoning pulls ahead

  • Recent programming contest problemsLiveCodeBench v6+21.8points aheadQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning65.6Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct43.8
  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+21points aheadQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning55.3Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct34.3
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+20.2points aheadQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning59.4Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct39.2

Where Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct pulls ahead

  • Reads text in imagesOCRBench+4points aheadQwen3 VL 32B Instruct89.5Qwen3 VL 32B Reasoning85.5
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+1.6points aheadQwen3 VL 32B Instruct30.1Qwen3 VL 32B Reasoning28.5

Every test, side by side

All 48 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingEven

Full coding ranking

AgentsQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning

Full agents ranking

ReasoningQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning

Full reasoning ranking

FactsQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning
  • OCRBenchQwen3 VL 32B Instruct by 489.585.5+4
  • CharXiv (RQ)Qwen3 VL 32B Reasoning by 2.462.865.2+2.4
  • MathVistaQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning by 2.183.885.9+2.1
  • MMStarQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning by 1.777.779.4+1.7
  • BLINKQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning by 1.267.368.5+1.2
  • MMMU-Protie64.363.4tie

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning
  • AA-LCRQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning by 2134.355.3+21

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning
  • IFBenchQwen3 VL 32B Reasoning by 20.239.259.4+20.2

Full following instructions ranking

Other results30 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 32B Reasoning?

Qwen3 VL 32B Reasoning wins six of the seven areas where both have results: agents, reasoning, facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct wins none. They are level on coding.

Which is better for coding?

Neither. They win 1 coding test each of the 3 both models report, and 1 is a tie.

Which is cheaper?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct costs $0.16 per million input tokens and $0.64 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 32B Reasoning costs $0.16 and $0.64. For a million tokens read plus a million written, they cost about the same.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 48 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 18 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 30 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.