Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

DeepSeek-V3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

DeepSeek · released

Wins 0 of 6 areas

—

NVIDIA · released

Wins 5 of 6 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Long documents · Following instructions

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 25 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

DeepSeek-V3$0.24 to read · $0.90 to write$1.14Price from Artificial Analysis
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.06 to read · $0.20 to write$0.26Price from Artificial Analysis

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 77% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+48.3points aheadNemotron 3.5 Lightning62.4DeepSeek-V314.1
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+30.9points aheadNemotron 3.5 Lightning71.9DeepSeek-V341
  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+19.6points aheadNemotron 3.5 Lightning60.3DeepSeek-V340.7

Where DeepSeek-V3 pulls ahead

  • Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+11.1points aheadDeepSeek-V325.4Nemotron 3.5 Lightning14.4
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+6.9points aheadDeepSeek-V339Nemotron 3.5 Lightning32.1

Every test, side by side

All 25 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingNemotron 3.5 Lightning

Full coding ranking

AgentsNemotron 3.5 Lightning

Full agents ranking

ReasoningNemotron 3.5 Lightning

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

Long documentsNemotron 3.5 Lightning
  • AA-LCRNemotron 3.5 Lightning by 19.640.760.3+19.6

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsNemotron 3.5 Lightning
  • IFBenchNemotron 3.5 Lightning by 30.94171.9+30.9

Full following instructions ranking

Other results12 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning wins five of the six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, long documents and following instructions. DeepSeek-V3 wins none. They are level on facts.

Which is better for coding?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning. It wins 2 of the 3 coding tests both models report; DeepSeek-V3 wins 1.

Which is cheaper?

DeepSeek-V3 costs $0.24 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs $0.06 and $0.20. That makes Nemotron 3.5 Lightning about 77% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 25 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.