DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs GPT-5.1
Wins 4 of 6 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Following instructions
Wins 1 of 6 areas
Long documents
DeepSeek-V4-Pro is the stronger all-rounder.GPT-5.1 is better at long documents.
Scores updated · 31 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software50DeepSeek-V4-Pro5 of 6 tests · 1 tie
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own30DeepSeek-V4-Pro3 of 3 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking31DeepSeek-V4-Pro3 of 4 tests
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10DeepSeek-V4-Pro1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01GPT-5.11 of 1 test
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up22Even2 each
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro costs 88% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where DeepSeek-V4-Pro pulls ahead
- Finds hard-to-locate facts by browsing the webBrowseComp+32.6points ahead
- Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+16.4points ahead
- Customer-service tasks in a simulated bankτ-Bench V3 · Banking+14.2points ahead
Where GPT-5.1 pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+42.2points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+5.3points ahead
- Common-sense trick questionsSimpleBench+2.3points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 31 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingDeepSeek-V4-Pro
- Terminal-Bench 2.1DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 11.66452.4+11.6
- SciCodeDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 7.550.843.3+7.5
- LMArena · WebDevDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 69 rating points14641395+69 rating
- LiveCodeBench v6DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 5.592.587+5.5
- SWE-bench VerifiedDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 4.380.676.3+4.3
- Terminal-Bench Hardtie46.245.5tie
AgentsDeepSeek-V4-Pro
- BrowseCompDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 32.683.450.8+32.6
- GDPValDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 16.432.916.5+16.4
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 14.230.115.9+14.2
ReasoningDeepSeek-V4-Pro
- Humanity's Last ExamDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 937.528.5+9
- CritPtDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 812.94.9+8
- SimpleBenchGPT-5.1 by 2.350.953.2+2.3
- GPQA DiamondDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 1.588.887.3+1.5
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGPT-5.1 by 42.25.948.1+42.2
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 5.34337.7+5.3
- Vectara HHEM hallucination ratelower is betterDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 3.58.612.1+3.5
- SimpleQA VerifiedGPT-5.1 by 1.846.248+1.8
Following instructionsDeepSeek-V4-Pro
- IFBenchDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 3.676.572.9+3.6
Other results12 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- Terminal-Bench 2.0DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 20.367.947.6+20.3
- HLE (with tools)DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 17.36042.7+17.3
- AA-OmniscienceGPT-5.1 by 16.1-10.75.4+16.1
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 14.396.281.9+14.3
- vectara_avg_summary_lengthGPT-5.1 by 100.6 rating points153.8254.4+100.6 rating
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 1059.449.4+10
- AA Agentic IndexDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 6.127.721.6+6.1
- AA IntelligenceDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 5.730.424.7+5.7
- vectara_factual_consistencyDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 3.591.487.9+3.5
- vectara_answer_rateGPT-5.1 by 2.897.2100+2.8
- HMMT Nov. 2025DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 2.794.491.7+2.7
- MMLU-Protie87.587tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Pro or GPT-5.1?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro wins four of the six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning and following instructions. GPT-5.1 wins long documents. They are level on facts.
Which is better for coding?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro. It wins 5 of the 6 coding tests both models report; GPT-5.1 wins none, and 1 is a tie.
Which is cheaper?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro costs $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1 costs $1.25 and $10.00. That makes DeepSeek-V4-Pro about 88% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 31 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 19 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.