Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct
Wins 5 of 6 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 6 areas
—
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct is cheaper.
Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Gemini 2.5 Pro3 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Gemini 2.5 Pro2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Gemini 2.5 Pro2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Gemini 2.5 Pro1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Gemini 2.5 Pro1 of 1 test
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video11Even1 each
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct costs 89% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 2.5 Pro pulls ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+27.7points ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+25points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+24.8points ahead
Where Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct pulls ahead
- Reads and reasons about text in imagesOCRBenchv2+2points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 2.5 Pro
- SciCodeGemini 2.5 Pro by 27.746.318.6+27.7
- Terminal-Bench HardGemini 2.5 Pro by 2526.51.5+25
ReasoningGemini 2.5 Pro
- GPQA DiamondGemini 2.5 Pro by 21.683.662+21.6
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 2.5 Pro by 13.4184.6+13.4
- CritPtGemini 2.5 Pro by 2.62.60+2.6
FactsGemini 2.5 Pro
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 2.5 Pro by 24.83914.3+24.8
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGemini 2.5 Pro by 6.79.12.4+6.7
Images and chartsEven
- MMMU-ProGemini 2.5 Pro by 19.474.955.5+19.4
- OCRBenchv2Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct by 259.361.3+2
Following instructionsGemini 2.5 Pro
- IFBenchGemini 2.5 Pro by 17.548.731.2+17.5
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 2.5 Pro by 53-16.4-69.3+53
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Gemini 2.5 Pro by 37.754.116.4+37.7
- AA IntelligenceGemini 2.5 Pro by 9156+9
- OCRBench v2 (Chinese)Gemini 2.5 Pro by 2.262.260+2.2
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct?
Gemini 2.5 Pro wins five of the six areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct wins none, but costs 89% less. They are level on images and charts.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.25 and $0.97. That makes Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct about 89% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.