Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni
Wins 7 of 7 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 7 areas
—
Gemini 3.1 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.Nemotron 3 Nano Omni is cheaper.
Scores updated · 22 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video41Gemini 3.1 Pro4 of 5 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software30Gemini 3.1 Pro3 of 3 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Gemini 3.1 Pro3 of 3 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own20Gemini 3.1 Pro2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Gemini 3.1 Pro2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Gemini 3.1 Pro1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Gemini 3.1 Pro1 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni costs 91% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 3.1 Pro pulls ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+67.1points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+47.2points ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+45.5points ahead
Where Nemotron 3 Nano Omni pulls ahead
- Reads and reasons about text in imagesOCRBenchv2+3points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 22 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 3.1 Pro
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Gemini 3.1 Pro by 67.173.86.7+67.1
- Terminal-Bench HardGemini 3.1 Pro by 45.553.88.3+45.5
- SciCodeGemini 3.1 Pro by 30.958.727.8+30.9
AgentsGemini 3.1 Pro
- OSWorld-VerifiedGemini 3.1 Pro by 28.876.247.4+28.8
- GDPValGemini 3.1 Pro by 14.714.70+14.7
ReasoningGemini 3.1 Pro
- GPQA DiamondGemini 3.1 Pro by 47.294.146.9+47.2
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 3.1 Pro by 42.2474.8+42.2
- CritPtGemini 3.1 Pro by 17.717.70+17.7
FactsGemini 3.1 Pro
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 3.1 Pro by 39.754.915.2+39.7
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGemini 3.1 Pro by 34.849.114.3+34.8
Images and chartsGemini 3.1 Pro
- MMMU-ProGemini 3.1 Pro by 29.282.453.2+29.2
- CharXiv (RQ)Gemini 3.1 Pro by 19.783.363.6+19.7
- Video-MMEGemini 3.1 Pro by 14.586.772.2+14.5
- MathVistaGemini 3.1 Pro by 7.490.282.8+7.4
- OCRBenchv2Nemotron 3 Nano Omni by 362.865.8+3
Following instructionsGemini 3.1 Pro
- IFBenchGemini 3.1 Pro by 13.977.163.2+13.9
Other results5 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 3.1 Pro by 89.331.9-57.4+89.3
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemini 3.1 Pro by 5568.813.8+55
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Gemini 3.1 Pro by 50.395.645.3+50.3
- AA IntelligenceGemini 3.1 Pro by 19.429.710.3+19.4
- MMAUGemini 3.1 Pro by 7.982.574.6+7.9
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins all seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni wins none, but costs 91% less.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro. It wins 3 of the 3 coding tests both models report; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni costs $0.30 and $0.90. That makes Nemotron 3 Nano Omni about 91% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 22 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 17 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.