Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus Preview
Wins 5 of 8 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Math · Long documents
Wins 1 of 8 areas
Images and charts
Gemini 3.1 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.Qwen3.7 Plus Preview is cheaper and better at images and charts.
Scores updated · 49 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the eight areas we test. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software61Gemini 3.1 Pro6 of 7 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own51Gemini 3.1 Pro5 of 6 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Gemini 3.1 Pro3 of 3 tests
- MathCompetition and research-level math21Gemini 3.1 Pro2 of 3 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Gemini 3.1 Pro1 of 1 test
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video23Qwen3.7 Plus Preview3 of 5 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked00Even0 each · 1 tie
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Qwen3.7 Plus Preview costs 86% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 3.1 Pro pulls ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+32.4points ahead
- Unpublished advanced math problemsFrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)+25.3points ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+12.8points ahead
Where Qwen3.7 Plus Preview pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+23.2points ahead
- Olympiad math problems with short answersIMOAnswerBench+5points ahead
- Reads and reasons about text in imagesOCRBenchv2+4.3points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 49 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 3.1 Pro
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Gemini 3.1 Pro by 12.873.861+12.8
- SciCodeGemini 3.1 Pro by 12.658.746.1+12.6
- Terminal-Bench HardGemini 3.1 Pro by 6.853.847+6.8
- SWE-bench ProQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 3.454.257.6+3.4
- SWE-bench VerifiedGemini 3.1 Pro by 2.980.677.7+2.9
- LiveCodeBench v6Gemini 3.1 Pro by 2.191.789.6+2.1
- SWE-bench MultilingualGemini 3.1 Pro by 1.176.975.8+1.1
AgentsGemini 3.1 Pro
- AA ApexAgentsGemini 3.1 Pro by 9.63222.4+9.6
- MCP AtlasQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 469.273.2+4
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingGemini 3.1 Pro by 3.921.417.5+3.9
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Gemini 3.1 Pro by 341+3
- OSWorld-VerifiedGemini 3.1 Pro by 2.976.273.3+2.9
- GDPValGemini 3.1 Pro by 1.214.713.5+1.2
ReasoningGemini 3.1 Pro
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 3.1 Pro by 11.44735.6+11.4
- CritPtGemini 3.1 Pro by 8.617.79.1+8.6
- GPQA DiamondGemini 3.1 Pro by 4.194.190+4.1
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 3.1 Pro by 32.454.922.5+32.4
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 23.249.172.3+23.2
Images and chartsQwen3.7 Plus Preview
- OCRBenchv2Qwen3.7 Plus Preview by 4.362.867.1+4.3
- CharXiv (RQ)Qwen3.7 Plus Preview by 2.683.385.9+2.6
- MMMU-ProGemini 3.1 Pro by 1.982.480.5+1.9
- LMArena · VisionGemini 3.1 Pro by 16 rating points12961280+16 rating
- Video-MMEQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 1.386.788+1.3
MathGemini 3.1 Pro
- FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)Gemini 3.1 Pro by 25.359.634.4+25.3
- IMOAnswerBenchQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 58186+5
- HMMT Feb. 2026Gemini 3.1 Pro by 1.894.792.9+1.8
Other results21 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- Apex (Pass@1)Gemini 3.1 Pro by 38.260.922.7+38.2
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 3.1 Pro by 30.831.91.1+30.8
- WorldVQAQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 16.844.361.1+16.8
- BabyVisionQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 1654.470.4+16
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemini 3.1 Pro by 12.968.855.9+12.9
- SimpleVQAQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 11.869.981.7+11.8
- LVBenchQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 1066.276.2+10
- AA Agentic IndexQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 9.410.319.7+9.4
- NL2RepoQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 7.733.441.1+7.7
- TVBenchQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 7.27178.2+7.2
- Finance Agent v2Gemini 3.1 Pro by 4.84338.2+4.8
- AA IntelligenceGemini 3.1 Pro by 4.529.725.2+4.5
- DeepSWE 1.1Qwen3.7 Plus Preview by 4.51216.5+4.5
- MMMLUGemini 3.1 Pro by 3.692.689+3.6
- MCPMarkQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 2.855.958.7+2.8
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Gemini 3.1 Pro by 2.695.693+2.6
- MMLU-ProGemini 3.1 Pro by 2.59188.5+2.5
- Terminal-Bench 2.0Qwen3.7 Plus Preview by 1.868.570.3+1.8
- RealWorldQAQwen3.7 Plus Preview by 1.585.486.9+1.5
- ERQAGemini 3.1 Pro by 170.869.8+1
- MATH-Visiontie89.890.3tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus Preview?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins five of the eight areas we test: coding, agents, reasoning, math and long documents. Qwen3.7 Plus Preview wins images and charts, and costs 86% less. They are level on facts and following instructions.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro. It wins 6 of the 7 coding tests both models report; Qwen3.7 Plus Preview wins 1.
Which is cheaper?
Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus Preview costs $0.40 and $1.60. That makes Qwen3.7 Plus Preview about 86% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 49 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 28 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 21 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.