GPT-5.2 vs Grok 4 Fast
Wins 7 of 7 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 7 areas
—
GPT-5.2 is the stronger all-rounder.Grok 4 Fast is cheaper.
Scores updated · 27 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking40GPT-5.24 of 4 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software30GPT-5.23 of 3 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own20GPT-5.22 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up21GPT-5.22 of 3 tests
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video10GPT-5.21 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10GPT-5.21 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10GPT-5.21 of 1 test
Images and charts, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Grok 4 Fast costs 96% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where GPT-5.2 pulls ahead
- Abstract visual puzzles that people can solveARC-AGI-2+47.6points ahead
- Hard command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench Hard+28.1points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+24.9points ahead
Where Grok 4 Fast pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+12.9points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 27 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGPT-5.2
- Terminal-Bench HardGPT-5.2 by 28.14718.9+28.1
- LMArena · WebDevGPT-5.2 by 257 rating points14161159+257 rating
- SciCodeGPT-5.2 by 7.952.144.2+7.9
AgentsGPT-5.2
- GDPValGPT-5.2 by 22.648.325.7+22.6
- BrowseCompGPT-5.2 by 20.965.844.9+20.9
ReasoningGPT-5.2
- ARC-AGI-2GPT-5.2 by 47.652.95.3+47.6
- Humanity's Last ExamGPT-5.2 by 18.637.719.1+18.6
- CritPtGPT-5.2 by 8.711.62.9+8.7
- GPQA DiamondGPT-5.2 by 5.690.384.7+5.6
FactsGPT-5.2
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGPT-5.2 by 21.544.322.8+21.5
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGrok 4 Fast by 12.918.831.7+12.9
- Vectara HHEM hallucination ratelower is betterGPT-5.2 by 9.410.820.2+9.4
Other results12 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- ARC-AGI-1GPT-5.2 by 37.786.248.5+37.7
- AA-OmniscienceGPT-5.2 by 29-0.9-29.9+29
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGPT-5.2 by 21.348.727.4+21.3
- AA Agentic IndexGPT-5.2 by 20.760.239.5+20.7
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)GPT-5.2 by 1984.865.8+19
- AA IntelligenceGPT-5.2 by 12.530.417.9+12.5
- vectara_factual_consistencyGPT-5.2 by 9.489.279.8+9.4
- LiveCodeBenchGPT-5.2 by 98980+9
- AIME 2025GPT-5.2 by 810092+8
- HMMT 2025GPT-5.2 by 6.199.493.3+6.1
- vectara_avg_summary_lengthGPT-5.2 by 12.4 rating points186.3173.9+12.4 rating
- vectara_answer_ratetie10099.5tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Grok 4 Fast?
GPT-5.2 wins all seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Grok 4 Fast wins none, but costs 96% less.
Which is better for coding?
GPT-5.2. It wins 3 of the 3 coding tests both models report; Grok 4 Fast wins none.
Which is cheaper?
GPT-5.2 costs $1.75 per million input tokens and $14.00 per million output tokens; Grok 4 Fast costs $0.20 and $0.50. That makes Grok 4 Fast about 96% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 27 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 15 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.