GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview
38 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 38 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on 9 and Qwen3.8 Max Preview on 29. The widest gap is AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination, where Qwen3.8 Max Preview scores 71.2 against 7.4. GPT-5.6 Luna is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.20 against $2.00 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: OpenAI's own price page for GPT-5.6 Luna; Artificial Analysis for Qwen3.8 Max Preview. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
GPT-5.6 Luna pulls furthest ahead on
- AA-Omniscience · Accuracy42.7 vs 31.7
- FrontierMath Tier 458.5 vs 46.3
- LiveBench · Coding82.9 vs 72.9
Qwen3.8 Max Preview pulls furthest ahead on
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination71.2 vs 7.4
- Terminal-Bench 4.038.9 vs 11.6
- τ-Bench V3 · Banking47.8 vs 31.1
Every shared benchmark38 · grouped by area
Reasoning 4
Coding 6
Agentic 4
Factuality 3
Instruction Following 1
Long Context 1
Math 3
Multimodal 2
Other shared benchmarks 14
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (openai-official, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.