Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) vs Nova Pro
Wins 0 of 6 areas
—
Wins 5 of 6 areas
Coding · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions
Nova Pro is the stronger all-rounder.Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) is cheaper.
Scores updated · 21 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software02Nova Pro2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02Nova Pro2 of 2 tests
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video01Nova Pro1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01Nova Pro1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01Nova Pro1 of 1 test
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking11Even1 each · 1 tie
Images and charts, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) costs 83% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Nova Pro pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+27.8points ahead
- Harder college exam questions with imagesMMMU-Pro+15points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+9.6points ahead
Where Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) pulls ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+2.3points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 21 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingNova Pro
- SciCodeNova Pro by 9.611.220.8+9.6
- Terminal-Bench HardNova Pro by 5.30.86.1+5.3
ReasoningEven
- GPQA DiamondNova Pro by 27.822.149.9+27.8
- Humanity's Last ExamLlama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) by 2.35.53.2+2.3
- CritPttie00tie
FactsNova Pro
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyNova Pro by 6.310.616.9+6.3
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationNova Pro by 4.218.122.3+4.2
Other results11 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- MMLUNova Pro by 24.751.175.8+24.7
- OpenBookQANova Pro by 23.672.496+23.6
- naturalquestions_closedbookNova Pro by 17.123.440.5+17.1
- AA-OmniscienceNova Pro by 14.9-62.6-47.7+14.9
- GSM8KNova Pro by 12.582.394.8+12.5
- MATHNova Pro by 8.273.982.1+8.2
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexNova Pro by 6.84.211+6.8
- NarrativeQANova Pro by 3.575.679.1+3.5
- AA IntelligenceNova Pro by 1.65.47+1.6
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)tie14.614tie
- AA Agentic Indextie4.94.7tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) or Nova Pro?
Nova Pro wins five of the six areas where both have results: coding, facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) wins none, but costs 83% less. They are level on reasoning.
Which is better for coding?
Nova Pro. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) costs $0.34 per million input tokens and $0.34 per million output tokens; Nova Pro costs $0.80 and $3.20. That makes Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) about 83% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 21 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 11 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.