Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning
Wins 2 of 7 areas
Agents · Images and charts
Wins 5 of 7 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning is the stronger all-rounder.Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is cheaper and better at images and charts.
Scores updated · 49 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software03Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning3 of 3 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up01Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning1 of 1 test
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video32Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct3 of 7 tests · 2 ties
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own10Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct1 of 1 test
Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs 55% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+31points ahead
- Recent programming contest problemsLiveCodeBench v6+15.8points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+13.8points ahead
Where Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct pulls ahead
- Completes tasks by operating a computer desktopOSWorld-Verified+28.6points ahead
- Reads text in imagesOCRBench+4.5points ahead
- Visual perception tasks people solve at a glanceBLINK+3.6points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 49 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning
- LiveCodeBench v6Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 15.854.370.1+15.8
- Terminal-Bench HardQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 4.66.811.4+4.6
- SciCodeQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 435.939.9+4
AgentsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
- OSWorld-VerifiedQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 28.666.738.1+28.6
ReasoningQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning
- GPQA DiamondQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 671.277.2+6
- Humanity's Last ExamQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 5.36.611.9+5.3
- CritPttie00tie
FactsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 6.48.414.8+6.4
- AA-Omniscience · Accuracytie20.320.9tie
Images and chartsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
- OCRBenchQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 4.59287.5+4.5
- LMArena · VisionQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 41 rating points12471206+41 rating
- CharXiv (RQ)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 462.166.1+4
- BLINKQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 3.670.767.1+3.6
- MMMU-ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 1.167.668.7+1.1
- MathVistatie84.985.8tie
- MMStartie78.478.7tie
Long documentsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning
- AA-LCRQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 3132.763.7+31
Following instructionsQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning
- IFBenchQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 13.842.756.5+13.8
Other results31 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- HMMT 2025Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 2057.477.4+20
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 1935.154.1+19
- AIME 2025Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 1574.789.7+15
- MATH-VisionQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 8.166.574.6+8.1
- SimpleQAQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 7.551.944.4+7.5
- AA-OmniscienceQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 6.2-52.7-46.5+6.2
- VideoMMMUQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 5.374.780+5.3
- BFCL v3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 4.267.771.9+4.2
- LVBenchQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 4.167.763.6+4.1
- SuperGPQAQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 3.960.464.3+3.9
- AA IntelligenceQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 3.59.913.4+3.5
- HallusionBenchQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 3.563.266.7+3.5
- MMLU-ProXQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 2.877.880.6+2.8
- MMLU-ProQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 281.883.8+2
- RealWorldQAQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 279.381.3+2
- MMMU (val) (Pass@1)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 1.978.780.6+1.9
- OCRBench v2 (Chinese)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 1.761.863.5+1.7
- MMLU-ReduxQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 1.592.293.7+1.5
- CharadesSTAQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct by 1.364.863.5+1.3
- ERQAQwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning by 1.251.352.5+1.2
- CC-OCRtie82.281.5tie
- DocVQA_testtie97.196.5tie
- AI2Dtie89.789.2tie
- MLVUtie84.383.8tie
- IFEvaltie87.888.2tie
- InfoVQA_testtie89.289.5tie
- OCRBench v2_entie67.166.8tie
- ScreenSpot-Pro (No tools)tie6261.8tie
- Includetie8080tie
- MM MTBenchtie8.58.5tie
- ScreenSpottie95.495.4tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning wins five of the seven areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins agents and images and charts, and costs 55% less.
Which is better for coding?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning. It wins 3 of the 3 coding tests both models report; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning costs $0.40 and $4.00. That makes Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct about 55% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 49 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 18 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 31 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.