Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Kimi K3

Anthropic · released

Wins 1 of 8 areas

Math

Moonshot · released

Wins 7 of 8 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions

Kimi K3 is the stronger all-rounder.Claude Sonnet 4.6 is better at math.

Scores updated · 38 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude Sonnet 4.6$3.00 to read · $15.00 to write$18Price from Artificial Analysis
Kimi K3$3.00 to read · $15.00 to write$18Price from Artificial Analysis

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Kimi K3 pulls ahead

  • Multi-step tasks using many real software toolsMCP Atlas+22.9points aheadKimi K384.2Claude Sonnet 4.661.3
  • Research-level physics problemsCritPt+20.3points aheadKimi K323.4Claude Sonnet 4.63.1
  • Reasoning about charts from research papersCharXiv (RQ)+19.7points aheadKimi K391.3Claude Sonnet 4.671.6

Where Claude Sonnet 4.6 pulls ahead

Every test, side by side

All 38 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingKimi K3

Full coding ranking

AgentsKimi K3

Full agents ranking

ReasoningKimi K3

Full reasoning ranking

FactsKimi K3

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsKimi K3

Full images and charts ranking

MathClaude Sonnet 4.6

Full math ranking

Long documentsKimi K3
  • AA-LCRKimi K3 by 8.78088.7+8.7

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsKimi K3

Full following instructions ranking

Other results12 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 wins seven of the eight areas we test: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins math.

Which is better for coding?

Kimi K3. It wins 5 of the 5 coding tests both models report; Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K3 costs $3.00 and $15.00. For a million tokens read plus a million written, they cost about the same.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 38 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 26 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.