Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K3

Moonshot · released

Wins 0 of 8 areas

—

Moonshot · released

Wins 8 of 8 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Math · Long documents · Following instructions

Kimi K3 is the stronger all-rounder.Kimi K2.6 is cheaper.

Scores updated · 41 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Kimi K2.6$0.95 to read · $4.00 to write$4.95Price from Artificial Analysis
Kimi K3$3.00 to read · $15.00 to write$18Price from Artificial Analysis

Kimi K2.6 costs 73% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Kimi K3 pulls ahead

  • Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+24.7points aheadKimi K351.7Kimi K2.627
  • Customer-service tasks in a simulated bankτ-Bench V3 · Banking+22.7points aheadKimi K346Kimi K2.623.3
  • Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+19.1points aheadKimi K385Kimi K2.665.9

Where Kimi K2.6 pulls ahead

Every test, side by side

All 41 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingKimi K3

Full coding ranking

AgentsKimi K3

Full agents ranking

ReasoningKimi K3

Full reasoning ranking

FactsKimi K3

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsKimi K3

Full images and charts ranking

MathKimi K3

Full math ranking

Long documentsKimi K3
  • AA-LCRKimi K3 by 7.78188.7+7.7

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsKimi K3

Full following instructions ranking

Other results12 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Kimi K2.6 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 wins all eight areas we test: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, images and charts, math, long documents and following instructions. Kimi K2.6 wins none, but costs 73% less.

Which is better for coding?

Kimi K3. It wins 5 of the 5 coding tests both models report; Kimi K2.6 wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K3 costs $3.00 and $15.00. That makes Kimi K2.6 about 73% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 41 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 29 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.