Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Wins 7 of 8 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Images and charts · Math · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 8 areas
—
Gemini 3.1 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper.
Scores updated · 40 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the eight areas we test. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking50Gemini 3.1 Pro5 of 5 tests
- MathCompetition and research-level math50Gemini 3.1 Pro5 of 5 tests
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video30Gemini 3.1 Pro3 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software31Gemini 3.1 Pro3 of 7 tests · 3 ties
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own31Gemini 3.1 Pro3 of 4 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Gemini 3.1 Pro1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Gemini 3.1 Pro1 of 1 test
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 80% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 3.1 Pro pulls ahead
- Abstract visual puzzles that people can solveARC-AGI-2+66.8points ahead
- Unpublished advanced math problemsFrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)+33.7points ahead
- Harvard-MIT high-school math contest problemsHMMT Feb. 2026+31.1points ahead
Where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+16.5points ahead
- Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+9.6points ahead
- Fixes real GitHub issues, working as an agentLiveBench · Agentic Coding+1.2points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 40 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 3.1 Pro
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Gemini 3.1 Pro by 20.273.853.6+20.2
- SciCodeGemini 3.1 Pro by 17.458.741.3+17.4
- SWE-bench VerifiedGemini 3.1 Pro by 5.680.675+5.6
- LiveBench · Agentic CodingGemini 3.5 Flash Lite by 1.244.145.3+1.2
- LMArena · WebDevtie14471440tie
- LiveBench · Codingtie76.576.1tie
- SWE-bench Protie54.254.2tie
AgentsGemini 3.1 Pro
- GDPValGemini 3.5 Flash Lite by 9.614.724.3+9.6
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingGemini 3.1 Pro by 3.921.417.5+3.9
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Gemini 3.1 Pro by 341+3
- OSWorld-VerifiedGemini 3.1 Pro by 2.276.274+2.2
ReasoningGemini 3.1 Pro
- ARC-AGI-2Gemini 3.1 Pro by 66.877.110.3+66.8
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 3.1 Pro by 28.24718.8+28.2
- LiveBench · ReasoningGemini 3.1 Pro by 23.88460.2+23.8
- CritPtGemini 3.1 Pro by 17.717.70+17.7
- GPQA DiamondGemini 3.1 Pro by 10.394.183.8+10.3
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 3.1 Pro by 25.454.929.5+25.4
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGemini 3.5 Flash Lite by 16.549.165.6+16.5
Images and chartsGemini 3.1 Pro
- CharXiv (RQ)Gemini 3.1 Pro by 6.883.376.5+6.8
- MMMU-ProGemini 3.1 Pro by 3.482.479+3.4
- LMArena · VisionGemini 3.1 Pro by 30 rating points12961266+30 rating
MathGemini 3.1 Pro
- FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)Gemini 3.1 Pro by 33.759.626+33.7
- HMMT Feb. 2026Gemini 3.1 Pro by 31.194.763.6+31.1
- FrontierMath Tier 4Gemini 3.1 Pro by 26.826.80+26.8
- LiveBench · MathematicsGemini 3.1 Pro by 17.39173.7+17.3
- AIME 2026Gemini 3.1 Pro by 16.198.382.2+16.1
Following instructionsGemini 3.1 Pro
- LiveBench · Instruction FollowingGemini 3.1 Pro by 11.979.167.2+11.9
Other results12 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- ARC-AGI-1Gemini 3.1 Pro by 44.59853.5+44.5
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 3.1 Pro by 26.731.95.2+26.7
- livebench_data_analysisGemini 3.1 Pro by 25.278.553.3+25.2
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemini 3.1 Pro by 19.568.849.3+19.5
- GDPval-AA v2Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite by 178 rating points9621140+178 rating
- livebench_languageGemini 3.1 Pro by 13.685.471.8+13.6
- HLE (with tools)Gemini 3.1 Pro by 8.951.442.5+8.9
- AA IntelligenceGemini 3.1 Pro by 7.529.722.2+7.5
- AA Agentic IndexGemini 3.5 Flash Lite by 5.610.315.9+5.6
- MLE-BenchGemini 3.1 Pro by 3.442.639.2+3.4
- SWEBench Pro Publictie54.254.2tie
- τ³-Bench Bankingtie16.516.5tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.1 Pro wins seven of the eight areas we test: coding, agents, reasoning, images and charts, math, long documents and following instructions. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite wins none, but costs 80% less. They are level on facts.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro. It wins 3 of the 7 coding tests both models report; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite wins 1, and 3 are ties.
Which is cheaper?
Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 and $2.50. That makes Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite about 80% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 40 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 28 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.