Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Qwen3.5 2B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5 2B

24 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 24 shared benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher on 24 and Qwen3.5 2B on 0. The widest gap is TauBench V3 - Banking, where Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 21.4 against 2.5.

GOOGLEVSALIBABA24 SHARED24–0 HEAD-TO-HEAD

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 ProMARGINQwen3.5 2B

AA Agentic Index21.40.8

AA Intelligence46.56.9

AA-LCR8225.6

AA-Omniscience32.9-60.2

Artificial Analysis Coding Index68.82.9

critpt17.70

gdpval23.10

Global-MMLU-Lite92.764.5

GPQA Diamond94.351.6

HLE51.45

IFBench77.141.3

MMLU-Pro9166.5

mmmlu92.663.1

MMMU-Pro8343

multichallenge71.433.7

OmniScience Accuracy55.38.1

OmniScience Non-Hallucination50.125.8

scicode597.2

t2-bench99.348.8

TauBench V3 - Banking21.42.5

Terminal-Bench 2.1743

Terminal-Bench Hard68.53.8

τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)99.381.6

τ³-Bench67.16.2

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro withALL PAIRINGS →

GoogleGemini 3 Pro Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 1.5 Pro Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 E2B

Across the fieldQwen3.6 27B Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.8 Max Preview Qwen3.7 Plus Preview Claude Opus 4 Qwen3.5 4B Gemini 3.6 Flash Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B

Compare Qwen3.5 2B withALL PAIRINGS →

AlibabaQwen3.5 35B A3B Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B A17B Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B Qwen3.5 27B Qwen3.6 Plus

Across the fieldGPT-5.4 GPT-5.2 Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet Gemini 3 Pro Claude Fable 5 GPT-5