Gemini 3 Pro vs GLM-4.7
Wins 7 of 7 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Math · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 7 areas
—
Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.GLM-4.7 is cheaper.
Scores updated · 37 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking40Gemini 3 Pro4 of 4 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software41Gemini 3 Pro4 of 6 tests · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up31Gemini 3 Pro3 of 4 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own20Gemini 3 Pro2 of 2 tests
- MathCompetition and research-level math10Gemini 3 Pro1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Gemini 3 Pro1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Gemini 3 Pro1 of 1 test
Math, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
GLM-4.7 costs 80% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 3 Pro pulls ahead
- Short factual questions, answered correctlySimpleQA Verified+40.7points ahead
- Common-sense trick questionsSimpleBench+28.7points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+26.5points ahead
Where GLM-4.7 pulls ahead
- Fixes real GitHub issues in many programming languagesSWE-bench Multilingual+1.7points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 37 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 3 Pro
- SciCodeGemini 3 Pro by 1156.145.1+11
- Terminal-Bench HardGemini 3 Pro by 9.941.731.8+9.9
- LiveCodeBench v6Gemini 3 Pro by 2.587.484.9+2.5
- SWE-bench VerifiedGemini 3 Pro by 2.476.273.8+2.4
- SWE-bench MultilingualGLM-4.7 by 1.76566.7+1.7
- LMArena · WebDevtie14401435tie
AgentsGemini 3 Pro
- GDPValGemini 3 Pro by 8.434.225.8+8.4
- BrowseCompGemini 3 Pro by 7.259.252+7.2
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro
- SimpleBenchGemini 3 Pro by 28.776.447.7+28.7
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 3 Pro by 12.339.727.4+12.3
- CritPtGemini 3 Pro by 7.49.11.7+7.4
- GPQA DiamondGemini 3 Pro by 4.990.885.9+4.9
FactsGemini 3 Pro
- SimpleQA VerifiedGemini 3 Pro by 40.772.932.2+40.7
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 3 Pro by 26.555.829.3+26.5
- Vectara HHEM hallucination ratelower is betterGLM-4.7 by 1.913.611.7+1.9
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGemini 3 Pro by 1.58.57+1.5
Following instructionsGemini 3 Pro
- IFBenchGemini 3 Pro by 2.570.467.9+2.5
Other results18 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 3 Pro by 51.715.3-36.4+51.7
- AA Agentic IndexGemini 3 Pro by 25.85226.2+25.8
- frontiermath_tier_4_v1Gemini 3 Pro by 18.818.80+18.8
- Terminal-Bench 2.0Gemini 3 Pro by 13.254.241+13.2
- τ²-BenchGemini 3 Pro by 10.69887.4+10.6
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)GLM-4.7 by 8.887.195.9+8.8
- browsecomp_with_context_managerGLM-4.7 by 8.359.267.5+8.3
- AA IntelligenceGemini 3 Pro by 5.82822.2+5.8
- MMLU-ProGemini 3 Pro by 5.890.184.3+5.8
- AIME 2025Gemini 3 Pro by 4.310095.7+4.3
- vectara_avg_summary_lengthGemini 3 Pro by 31.3 rating points101.970.6+31.3 rating
- HLE (with tools)Gemini 3 Pro by 345.842.8+3
- AIME 2026 I (Tools-allowed)GLM-4.7 by 2.390.692.9+2.3
- vectara_factual_consistencyGLM-4.7 by 1.986.488.3+1.9
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemini 3 Pro by 1.246.545.3+1.2
- HMMT Feb. 2025tie97.597.1tie
- vectara_answer_ratetie99.499.8tie
- HMMT Nov. 2025tie93.393.5tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or GLM-4.7?
Gemini 3 Pro wins all seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, math, long documents and following instructions. GLM-4.7 wins none, but costs 80% less.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 3 Pro. It wins 4 of the 6 coding tests both models report; GLM-4.7 wins 1, and 1 is a tie.
Which is cheaper?
Gemini 3 Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; GLM-4.7 costs $0.60 and $2.20. That makes GLM-4.7 about 80% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 37 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 19 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 18 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.