Gemini 3 Pro vs GLM-4.7-Flash
Wins 6 of 6 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 6 areas
—
Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper.
Scores updated · 24 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software40Gemini 3 Pro4 of 4 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Gemini 3 Pro3 of 3 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own20Gemini 3 Pro2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up21Gemini 3 Pro2 of 3 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Gemini 3 Pro1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Gemini 3 Pro1 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
GLM-4.7-Flash costs 97% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 3 Pro pulls ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+39.6points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+34.3points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+32.7points ahead
Where GLM-4.7-Flash pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 24 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 3 Pro
- LiveCodeBench v6Gemini 3 Pro by 23.487.464+23.4
- SciCodeGemini 3 Pro by 22.456.133.7+22.4
- Terminal-Bench HardGemini 3 Pro by 19.741.722+19.7
- SWE-bench VerifiedGemini 3 Pro by 1776.259.2+17
AgentsGemini 3 Pro
- GDPValGemini 3 Pro by 17.334.216.9+17.3
- BrowseCompGemini 3 Pro by 16.459.242.8+16.4
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro
- GPQA DiamondGemini 3 Pro by 32.790.858.1+32.7
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 3 Pro by 32.139.77.6+32.1
- CritPtGemini 3 Pro by 8.89.10.3+8.8
FactsGemini 3 Pro
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 3 Pro by 39.655.816.1+39.6
- Vectara HHEM hallucination ratelower is betterGLM-4.7-Flash by 4.313.69.3+4.3
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGemini 3 Pro by 2.48.56.1+2.4
Following instructionsGemini 3 Pro
- IFBenchGemini 3 Pro by 9.670.460.8+9.6
Other results10 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 3 Pro by 77.915.3-62.6+77.9
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemini 3 Pro by 20.646.525.9+20.6
- τ²-BenchGemini 3 Pro by 18.59879.5+18.5
- AA IntelligenceGemini 3 Pro by 13.12814.9+13.1
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)GLM-4.7-Flash by 11.787.198.8+11.7
- AIME 2025Gemini 3 Pro by 8.410091.6+8.4
- vectara_answer_rateGemini 3 Pro by 7.899.491.6+7.8
- AA Agentic IndexGemini 3 Pro by 65246+6
- vectara_factual_consistencyGLM-4.7-Flash by 4.386.490.7+4.3
- vectara_avg_summary_lengthGemini 3 Pro by 30.1 rating points101.971.8+30.1 rating
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or GLM-4.7-Flash?
Gemini 3 Pro wins all six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, long documents and following instructions. GLM-4.7-Flash wins none, but costs 97% less.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 3 Pro. It wins 4 of the 4 coding tests both models report; GLM-4.7-Flash wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Gemini 3 Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; GLM-4.7-Flash costs $0.07 and $0.40. That makes GLM-4.7-Flash about 97% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 24 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 14 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 10 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.