Kimi K2.6 vs MiMo V2 Omni
Wins 6 of 7 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 1 of 7 areas
Agents
Kimi K2.6 is the stronger all-rounder.MiMo V2 Omni is cheaper and better at agents.
Scores updated · 20 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software30Kimi K2.63 of 3 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Kimi K2.63 of 3 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Kimi K2.62 of 2 tests
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video20Kimi K2.62 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Kimi K2.61 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Kimi K2.61 of 1 test
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own01MiMo V2 Omni1 of 1 test
Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
MiMo V2 Omni costs 52% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Kimi K2.6 pulls ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+22.5points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+15.4points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+14.8points ahead
Where MiMo V2 Omni pulls ahead
- Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+13.9points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 20 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingKimi K2.6
- SciCodeKimi K2.6 by 14.851.536.7+14.8
- Terminal-Bench HardKimi K2.6 by 9.143.934.8+9.1
- SWE-bench VerifiedKimi K2.6 by 5.480.274.8+5.4
ReasoningKimi K2.6
- Humanity's Last ExamKimi K2.6 by 15.437.522.1+15.4
- GPQA DiamondKimi K2.6 by 8.391.182.8+8.3
- CritPtKimi K2.6 by 6.981.1+6.9
FactsKimi K2.6
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyKimi K2.6 by 13.332.619.3+13.3
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationKimi K2.6 by 8.459.551.1+8.4
Images and chartsKimi K2.6
- MMMU-ProKimi K2.6 by 9.579.469.9+9.5
- LMArena · VisionKimi K2.6 by 54 rating points12821228+54 rating
Following instructionsKimi K2.6
- IFBenchKimi K2.6 by 22.57653.5+22.5
Other results7 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA Agentic IndexMiMo V2 Omni by 36.522.158.6+36.5
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexKimi K2.6 by 26.361.835.5+26.3
- Claw Eval (pass@3)Kimi K2.6 by 26.180.954.8+26.1
- AA-OmniscienceKimi K2.6 by 25.45.3-20.1+25.4
- PinchBenchKimi K2.6 by 990.281.2+9
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Kimi K2.6 by 4.795.991.2+4.7
- AA IntelligenceKimi K2.6 by 3.12723.9+3.1
Questions people ask
Which is better, Kimi K2.6 or MiMo V2 Omni?
Kimi K2.6 wins six of the seven areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. MiMo V2 Omni wins agents, and costs 52% less.
Which is better for coding?
Kimi K2.6. It wins 3 of the 3 coding tests both models report; MiMo V2 Omni wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; MiMo V2 Omni costs $0.40 and $2.00. That makes MiMo V2 Omni about 52% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 20 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 7 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.