Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Ministral 3 3B vs Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)

Mistral · released

Wins 0 of 7 areas

—

Alibaba · released

Wins 6 of 7 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions

Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 23 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Ministral 3 3B$0.10 to read · $0.10 to write$0.20Price from Artificial Analysis
Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)No current price is tracked.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) pulls ahead

  • Harder college exam questions with imagesMMMU-Pro+13.9points aheadQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)52Ministral 3 3B38.1
  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+13.6points aheadQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)49.4Ministral 3 3B35.8
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+9.8points aheadQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)36.6Ministral 3 3B26.8

Where Ministral 3 3B pulls ahead

Every test, side by side

All 23 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)

Full coding ranking

AgentsQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)
  • GDPValQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) by 13.8013.8+13.8

Full agents ranking

ReasoningQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)
  • MMMU-ProQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) by 13.938.152+13.9
  • OCRBenchQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) by 7.373.580.8+7.3

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)
  • AA-LCRQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) by 4.31721.3+4.3

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)
  • IFBenchQwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) by 9.826.836.6+9.8

Full following instructions ranking

Other results11 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Ministral 3 3B or Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)?

Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) wins six of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Ministral 3 3B wins none. They are level on facts.

Which is better for coding?

Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning). It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Ministral 3 3B wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 23 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 12 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 11 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.