Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
⌘K
UTC
Models762Deals30d246Policy30d62, 12 pendingSources1,061

DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

DeepSeek · released

Wins 4 of 7 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts

NVIDIA · released

Wins 1 of 7 areas

Following instructions

DeepSeek-V4-Flash wins more areas, narrowly.Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B is better at following instructions.

Scores updated · 68 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Long documents rests on a single test.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash$0.44 to read · $1.32 to write$1.76Price from Artificial Analysis
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B$0.60 to read · $2.70 to write$3.30Price from Artificial Analysis

DeepSeek-V4-Flash costs 47% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.

Where DeepSeek-V4-Flash pulls ahead

  • Finds hard-to-locate facts by browsing the webBrowseComp+28.8points aheadDeepSeek-V4-Flash73.2Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B44.4
  • Customer-service tasks in a simulated bankτ-Bench V3 · Banking+25.2points aheadDeepSeek-V4-Flash39.4Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B14.2
  • Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+24.8points aheadDeepSeek-V4-Flash78.7Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B53.9

Where Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B pulls ahead

Every test, side by side

All 68 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingDeepSeek-V4-Flash

Full coding ranking

AgentsDeepSeek-V4-Flash
  • BrowseCompDeepSeek-V4-Flash by 28.873.244.4+28.8
  • τ-Bench V3 · BankingDeepSeek-V4-Flash by 25.239.414.2+25.2
  • MCP AtlasDeepSeek-V4-Flash by 24.36944.7+24.3
  • GDPValDeepSeek-V4-Flash by 2146.725.7+21
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0DeepSeek-V4-Flash by 11.612.10.5+11.6

Full agents ranking

ReasoningDeepSeek-V4-Flash

Full reasoning ranking

FactsDeepSeek-V4-Flash

Full facts ranking

MathEven

Full math ranking

Long documentsEven

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsNemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B

Full following instructions ranking

Other results39 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Flash or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash wins four of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning and facts. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B wins following instructions. They are level on math and long documents.

Which is better for coding?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash. It wins 8 of the 9 coding tests both models report; Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B wins none, and 1 is a tie.

Which is cheaper?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash costs $0.44 per million input tokens and $1.32 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B costs $0.60 and $2.70. That makes DeepSeek-V4-Flash about 47% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 68 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 29 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 39 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.

Compare DeepSeek-V4-Flash with

DeepSeek

Across the field

Compare Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B with

All comparisons