Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B
Wins 5 of 6 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 6 areas
—
Gemma 4 26B A4B is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 18 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking20Gemma 4 26B A4B2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Gemma 4 26B A4B2 of 2 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own10Gemma 4 26B A4B1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Gemma 4 26B A4B1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Gemma 4 26B A4B1 of 1 test
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemma 4 26B A4B pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+57.4points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+41.7points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+32.7points ahead
Where Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+15.1points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 18 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemma 4 26B A4B
- SciCodeGemma 4 26B A4B by 16.74023.3+16.7
- Terminal-Bench HardGemma 4 26B A4B by 9.113.64.5+9.1
ReasoningGemma 4 26B A4B
- GPQA DiamondGemma 4 26B A4B by 32.779.246.5+32.7
- Humanity's Last ExamGemma 4 26B A4B by 15.119.34.2+15.1
- CritPttie00tie
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationLlama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B by 15.113.628.7+15.1
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemma 4 26B A4B by 1.319.117.8+1.3
Following instructionsGemma 4 26B A4B
- IFBenchGemma 4 26B A4B by 41.772.430.7+41.7
Other results8 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemma 4 26B A4B by 28.539.310.8+28.5
- ARC-ChallengeGemma 4 26B A4B by 23.692.869.2+23.6
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Gemma 4 26B A4B by 20.543.623.1+20.5
- AA-OmniscienceLlama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B by 10-50.8-40.8+10
- AA IntelligenceGemma 4 26B A4B by 9.816.76.9+9.8
- WinoGrandeLlama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B by 5.479.184.5+5.4
- AA Agentic IndexGemma 4 26B A4B by 3.3117.7+3.3
- HellaSwagtie85.385.6tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B?
Gemma 4 26B A4B wins five of the six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, long documents and following instructions. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B wins none. They are level on facts.
Which is better for coding?
Gemma 4 26B A4B. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 18 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 8 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.