VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC
Refresh Models Deals Regulatory Sources

GLM-5.1 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning

15 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 15 shared benchmarks, GLM-5.1 scores higher on 15 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning on 0. The widest gap is OmniScience Non-Hallucination, where GLM-5.1 scores 70.1 against 14.8. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.40 against $1.38 per million input tokens).

Z.AIVSALIBABA15 SHARED150 HEAD-TO-HEAD

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.

Compare GLM-5.1 withEVERY TRACKED PAIRING

Anthropic12 PAIRINGS
OpenAI11 PAIRINGS
Google10 PAIRINGS
Alibaba11 PAIRINGS
DeepSeek4 PAIRINGS
Moonshot4 PAIRINGS
Meta2 PAIRINGS
Z.ai1 PAIRING
MiniMax1 PAIRING
NVIDIA2 PAIRINGS

Compare Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning withEVERY TRACKED PAIRING

Anthropic12 PAIRINGS
OpenAI11 PAIRINGS
Google10 PAIRINGS
Alibaba11 PAIRINGS
DeepSeek4 PAIRINGS
Moonshot4 PAIRINGS
Meta2 PAIRINGS
Z.ai1 PAIRING
MiniMax1 PAIRING
NVIDIA2 PAIRINGS