Gemini 3 Pro vs GLM-5.1
Wins 3 of 7 areas
Reasoning · Facts · Long documents
Wins 3 of 7 areas
Coding · Agents · Following instructions
The two are evenly matched.Gemini 3 Pro is better at reasoning and facts; GLM-5.1 at coding and agents.
Scores updated · 37 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking40Gemini 3 Pro4 of 4 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up21Gemini 3 Pro2 of 3 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Gemini 3 Pro1 of 1 test
- CodingWriting and fixing software24GLM-5.14 of 7 tests · 1 tie
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own12GLM-5.12 of 3 tests
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked01GLM-5.11 of 1 test
- MathCompetition and research-level math11Even1 each · 1 tie
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
GLM-5.1 costs 59% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 3 Pro pulls ahead
- Short factual questions, answered correctlySimpleQA Verified+38.9points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+32.1points ahead
- Common-sense trick questionsSimpleBench+21.3points ahead
Where GLM-5.1 pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+61.6points ahead
- Finds hard-to-locate facts by browsing the webBrowseComp+20.1points ahead
- Multi-step tasks using many real software toolsMCP Atlas+17.7points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 37 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGLM-5.1
- SWE-bench ProGLM-5.1 by 15.143.358.4+15.1
- SciCodeGemini 3 Pro by 11.356.144.8+11.3
- SWE-bench MultilingualGLM-5.1 by 8.36573.3+8.3
- LMArena · WebDevGLM-5.1 by 68 rating points14401508+68 rating
- LiveCodeBench v6Gemini 3 Pro by 1.787.485.7+1.7
- Terminal-Bench HardGLM-5.1 by 1.541.743.2+1.5
- SWE-bench Verifiedtie76.276.2tie
AgentsGLM-5.1
- BrowseCompGLM-5.1 by 20.159.279.3+20.1
- MCP AtlasGLM-5.1 by 17.754.171.8+17.7
- GDPValGemini 3 Pro by 3.234.231+3.2
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro
- SimpleBenchGemini 3 Pro by 21.376.455.1+21.3
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 3 Pro by 9.639.730.1+9.6
- CritPtGemini 3 Pro by 4.59.14.6+4.5
- GPQA DiamondGemini 3 Pro by 490.886.8+4
FactsGemini 3 Pro
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationGLM-5.1 by 61.68.570.1+61.6
- SimpleQA VerifiedGemini 3 Pro by 38.972.934+38.9
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 3 Pro by 32.155.823.7+32.1
MathEven
- HMMT Feb. 2026Gemini 3 Pro by 3.886.482.6+3.8
- AIME 2026GLM-5.1 by 3.691.795.3+3.6
- IMOAnswerBenchtie83.183.8tie
Other results15 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- Vending-Bench 2GLM-5.1 by 15625 rating points547816563441+15625 rating
- GDPval-AA (Elo)GLM-5.1 by 340 rating points11951535+340 rating
- AA Agentic IndexGemini 3 Pro by 26.85225.2+26.8
- browsecomp_with_context_managerGLM-5.1 by 20.159.279.3+20.1
- Terminal-Bench 2.0GLM-5.1 by 14.854.269+14.8
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 3 Pro by 14.415.30.8+14.4
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)GLM-5.1 by 10.687.197.7+10.6
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGLM-5.1 by 9.346.555.8+9.3
- HLE (with tools)GLM-5.1 by 6.545.852.3+6.5
- frontiermath_tier_4_v1Gemini 3 Pro by 6.318.812.5+6.3
- ToolathlonGLM-5.1 by 4.336.440.7+4.3
- MMLU-ProGemini 3 Pro by 4.190.186+4.1
- LiveBenchGemini 3 Pro by 3.273.470.2+3.2
- AA IntelligenceGemini 3 Pro by 1.92826.1+1.9
- HMMT Nov. 2025tie93.394tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or GLM-5.1?
Gemini 3 Pro and GLM-5.1 each win three of the seven areas where both have results. Gemini 3 Pro wins reasoning, facts and long documents; GLM-5.1 wins coding, agents and following instructions. GLM-5.1 costs 59% less. They are level on math.
Which is better for coding?
GLM-5.1. It wins 4 of the 7 coding tests both models report; Gemini 3 Pro wins 2, and 1 is a tie.
Which is cheaper?
Gemini 3 Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; GLM-5.1 costs $1.38 and $4.40. That makes GLM-5.1 about 59% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 37 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 22 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 15 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.