VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC
Refresh Models Deals Regulatory Sources

Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning

20 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 20 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4 scores higher on 9 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning on 11. The widest gap is HMMT 2025, where Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning scores 77.4 against 15.9. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.40 against $15.00 per million input tokens).

ANTHROPICVSALIBABA20 SHARED911 HEAD-TO-HEAD
AA-LCR4063
AIME 202575.589.7
arena_vision12071206
GPQA Diamond79.677.2
HLE12.313.6
HMMT 202515.977.4
IFBench53.756.5
ifeval87.488.2
mmlu_redux94.293.7
MMLU-Pro86.683.8
MMMU73.778.7
scicode40.939.9
simpleqa22.844.4
supergpqa56.564.3
ZebraLogic95.197.3

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (anthropic-official, alibaba-official), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.

Compare Claude Opus 4 withEVERY TRACKED PAIRING

Anthropic11 PAIRINGS
OpenAI11 PAIRINGS
Google10 PAIRINGS
Alibaba11 PAIRINGS
DeepSeek4 PAIRINGS
Moonshot4 PAIRINGS
Meta2 PAIRINGS
Z.ai2 PAIRINGS
MiniMax1 PAIRING
NVIDIA2 PAIRINGS

Compare Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning withEVERY TRACKED PAIRING

Anthropic11 PAIRINGS
OpenAI11 PAIRINGS
Google10 PAIRINGS
Alibaba11 PAIRINGS
DeepSeek4 PAIRINGS
Moonshot4 PAIRINGS
Meta2 PAIRINGS
Z.ai2 PAIRINGS
MiniMax1 PAIRING
NVIDIA2 PAIRINGS