VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC
Refresh Models Deals Regulatory Sources

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning

25 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 25 shared benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher on 23 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning on 2. The widest gap is Terminal-Bench Hard, where Gemini 3.1 Pro scores 68.5 against 11.4. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.40 against $2.00 per million input tokens).

GOOGLEVSALIBABA25 SHARED232 HEAD-TO-HEAD
AA-LCR7963
arena_vision12951206
CCOCR KIE72.595.1
charxiv_rq89.966.1
critpt17.70
GPQA Diamond94.377.2
HLE51.413.6
IFBench77.156.5
Key Information Extraction Overall79.284.2
mathvision89.874.6
MMLU-Pro9183.8
MMMU-Pro8369.3
OCRBench KIE9694
OCRBenchv2 KIE (en)87.885.6
OCRBenchv2 KIE (zh)63.462.9
scicode5939.9

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (google-official, alibaba-official), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro withEVERY TRACKED PAIRING

Anthropic12 PAIRINGS
OpenAI11 PAIRINGS
Google9 PAIRINGS
Alibaba11 PAIRINGS
DeepSeek4 PAIRINGS
Moonshot4 PAIRINGS
Meta2 PAIRINGS
Z.ai2 PAIRINGS
MiniMax1 PAIRING
NVIDIA2 PAIRINGS

Compare Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning withEVERY TRACKED PAIRING

Anthropic12 PAIRINGS
OpenAI11 PAIRINGS
Google9 PAIRINGS
Alibaba11 PAIRINGS
DeepSeek4 PAIRINGS
Moonshot4 PAIRINGS
Meta2 PAIRINGS
Z.ai2 PAIRINGS
MiniMax1 PAIRING
NVIDIA2 PAIRINGS