VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC
Refresh Models Deals Regulatory Sources

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning

21 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 21 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher on 21 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning on 0. The widest gap is Terminal-Bench Hard, where Claude Opus 4.8 scores 58.3 against 11.4. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.40 against $5.00 per million input tokens).

ANTHROPICVSALIBABA21 SHARED210 HEAD-TO-HEAD

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (anthropic-official, alibaba-official), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.

Compare Claude Opus 4.8 withEVERY TRACKED PAIRING

OpenAI11 PAIRINGS
Google10 PAIRINGS
Anthropic11 PAIRINGS
Alibaba11 PAIRINGS
DeepSeek4 PAIRINGS
Moonshot4 PAIRINGS
Meta2 PAIRINGS
Z.ai2 PAIRINGS
MiniMax1 PAIRING
NVIDIA2 PAIRINGS

Compare Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Reasoning withEVERY TRACKED PAIRING

OpenAI11 PAIRINGS
Google10 PAIRINGS
Anthropic11 PAIRINGS
Alibaba11 PAIRINGS
DeepSeek4 PAIRINGS
Moonshot4 PAIRINGS
Meta2 PAIRINGS
Z.ai2 PAIRINGS
MiniMax1 PAIRING
NVIDIA2 PAIRINGS