Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI · released

Wins 0 of 8 areas

—

OpenAI · released

Wins 8 of 8 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Math · Long documents · Following instructions

GPT-5.6 Terra is the stronger all-rounder.GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper.

Scores updated · 54 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

GPT-5.6 Luna$0.20 to read · $1.20 to write$1.40Price from Artificial Analysis
GPT-5.6 Terra$2.00 to read · $12.00 to write$14Price from Artificial Analysis

GPT-5.6 Luna costs 90% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where GPT-5.6 Terra pulls ahead

  • Abstract visual puzzles that people can solveARC-AGI-2+24.3points aheadGPT-5.6 Terra83.9GPT-5.6 Luna59.6
  • Complex command-line tasks across many fieldsTerminal-Bench 4.0+23.8points aheadGPT-5.6 Terra35.4GPT-5.6 Luna11.6
  • Finds one of eight look-alike replies in a long chatMRCR v2 8 needle 128k (average)+18.7points aheadGPT-5.6 Terra93.5GPT-5.6 Luna74.8

Where GPT-5.6 Luna pulls ahead

  • Programming problems, refreshed regularlyLiveBench · Coding+4.6points aheadGPT-5.6 Luna82.9GPT-5.6 Terra78.3

Every test, side by side

All 54 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingGPT-5.6 Terra

Full coding ranking

AgentsGPT-5.6 Terra

Full agents ranking

ReasoningGPT-5.6 Terra

Full reasoning ranking

FactsGPT-5.6 Terra

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsGPT-5.6 Terra

Full images and charts ranking

MathGPT-5.6 Terra

Full math ranking

Long documentsGPT-5.6 Terra

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsGPT-5.6 Terra

Full following instructions ranking

Other results23 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, GPT-5.6 Luna or GPT-5.6 Terra?

GPT-5.6 Terra wins all eight areas we test: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, images and charts, math, long documents and following instructions. GPT-5.6 Luna wins none, but costs 90% less.

Which is better for coding?

GPT-5.6 Terra. It wins 3 of the 6 coding tests both models report; GPT-5.6 Luna wins 1, and 2 are ties.

Which is cheaper?

GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.6 Terra costs $2.00 and $12.00. That makes GPT-5.6 Luna about 90% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 54 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 31 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 23 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.