Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Kimi K2.5 vs Muse Spark

Moonshot · released

Wins 0 of 7 areas

—

Meta · released

Wins 6 of 7 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Following instructions

Muse Spark is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 32 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Kimi K2.5$0.60 to read · $3.00 to write$3.60Price from Artificial Analysis
Muse SparkNo current price is tracked.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Muse Spark pulls ahead

  • Short factual questions, answered correctlySimpleQA Verified+32points aheadMuse Spark66.3Kimi K2.534.3
  • Abstract visual puzzles that people can solveARC-AGI-2+30.7points aheadMuse Spark42.5Kimi K2.511.8
  • Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+16.5points aheadMuse Spark62.2Kimi K2.545.7

Where Kimi K2.5 pulls ahead

Every test, side by side

All 32 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingMuse Spark

Full coding ranking

AgentsMuse Spark

Full agents ranking

ReasoningMuse Spark

Full reasoning ranking

FactsMuse Spark

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsMuse Spark

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsEven

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsMuse Spark

Full following instructions ranking

Other results11 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Kimi K2.5 or Muse Spark?

Muse Spark wins six of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, images and charts and following instructions. Kimi K2.5 wins none. They are level on long documents.

Which is better for coding?

Muse Spark. It wins 5 of the 6 coding tests both models report; Kimi K2.5 wins none, and 1 is a tie.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 32 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 21 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 11 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.