Gemini 3 Pro vs Kimi K2.5
Wins 5 of 8 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 8 areas
—
Gemini 3 Pro is the stronger all-rounder.Kimi K2.5 is cheaper.
Both rank among the ten best models we track in images and charts.
Scores updated · 71 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the eight areas we test. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking40Gemini 3 Pro4 of 4 tests
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video41Gemini 3 Pro4 of 6 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software32Gemini 3 Pro3 of 7 tests · 2 ties
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up21Gemini 3 Pro2 of 4 tests · 1 tie
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Gemini 3 Pro1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own22Even2 each
- MathCompetition and research-level math11Even1 each · 1 tie
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts11Even1 each
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Kimi K2.5 costs 74% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 3 Pro pulls ahead
- Short factual questions, answered correctlySimpleQA Verified+38.6points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+20.6points ahead
- Abstract visual puzzles that people can solveARC-AGI-2+19.3points ahead
Where Kimi K2.5 pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+25.8points ahead
- Finds hard-to-locate facts by browsing the webBrowseComp+15.7points ahead
- Multi-step tasks using many real software toolsMCP Atlas+9.7points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 71 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 3 Pro
- SWE-bench MultilingualKimi K2.5 by 86573+8
- SWE-bench ProKimi K2.5 by 7.443.350.7+7.4
- SciCodeGemini 3 Pro by 7.156.149+7.1
- Terminal-Bench HardGemini 3 Pro by 6.941.734.8+6.9
- LiveCodeBench v6Gemini 3 Pro by 2.487.485+2.4
- SWE-bench Verifiedtie76.276.8tie
- LMArena · WebDevtie14401436tie
AgentsEven
- GDPValGemini 3 Pro by 1734.217.2+17
- BrowseCompKimi K2.5 by 15.759.274.9+15.7
- MCP AtlasKimi K2.5 by 9.754.163.8+9.7
- AA ApexAgentsGemini 3 Pro by 6.918.411.5+6.9
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro
- ARC-AGI-2Gemini 3 Pro by 19.331.111.8+19.3
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 3 Pro by 939.730.7+9
- CritPtGemini 3 Pro by 69.13.1+6
- GPQA DiamondGemini 3 Pro by 2.990.887.9+2.9
FactsGemini 3 Pro
- SimpleQA VerifiedGemini 3 Pro by 38.672.934.3+38.6
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationKimi K2.5 by 25.88.534.3+25.8
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 3 Pro by 20.655.835.2+20.6
- Vectara HHEM hallucination ratelower is bettertie13.614.2tie
Images and chartsGemini 3 Pro
- MMMU-ProGemini 3 Pro by 4.880.275.4+4.8
- CharXiv (RQ)Gemini 3 Pro by 3.981.477.5+3.9
- LMArena · VisionGemini 3 Pro by 36 rating points13051269+36 rating
- OCRBenchKimi K2.5 by 290.392.3+2
- Video-MMEGemini 3 Pro by 188.487.4+1
- MathVistatie89.890.1tie
MathEven
- AIME 2026Kimi K2.5 by 4.191.795.8+4.1
- IMOAnswerBenchGemini 3 Pro by 1.383.181.8+1.3
- HMMT Feb. 2026tie86.487.1tie
Long documentsEven
- LongBench v2Gemini 3 Pro by 7.268.261+7.2
- AA-LCRKimi K2.5 by 27678+2
Following instructionsGemini 3 Pro
- Multi-ChallengeGemini 3 Pro by 4.365.761.4+4.3
- IFBenchtie70.470.2tie
Other results39 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- InfoVQA (val)Kimi K2.5 by 35.457.292.6+35.4
- AA Agentic IndexGemini 3 Pro by 30.35221.7+30.3
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 3 Pro by 22.615.3-7.3+22.6
- FinSearchCompT2&T3Kimi K2.5 by 17.949.967.8+17.9
- browsecomp_with_context_managerKimi K2.5 by 15.759.274.9+15.7
- WideSearch (item-f1)Kimi K2.5 by 15.75772.7+15.7
- frontiermath_tier_4_v1Gemini 3 Pro by 14.618.84.2+14.6
- DeepSearchQA (F1)Kimi K2.5 by 13.963.277.1+13.9
- τ²-BenchGemini 3 Pro by 12.69885.4+12.6
- Seal-0Kimi K2.5 by 11.945.557.4+11.9
- OJ-Bench (cpp)Gemini 3 Pro by 11.168.557.4+11.1
- ARC-AGI-1Gemini 3 Pro by 9.77565.3+9.7
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Kimi K2.5 by 8.887.195.9+8.8
- ToolathlonGemini 3 Pro by 8.636.427.8+8.6
- vectara_answer_rateGemini 3 Pro by 7.299.492.2+7.2
- AA IntelligenceGemini 3 Pro by 4.52823.5+4.5
- HLE (with tools)Kimi K2.5 by 4.445.850.2+4.4
- LiveBenchGemini 3 Pro by 4.373.469.1+4.3
- HMMT Nov. 2025Gemini 3 Pro by 4.193.389.2+4.1
- AIME 2025Gemini 3 Pro by 3.910096.1+3.9
- matharena_visual_math_overallGemini 3 Pro by 3.684.280.6+3.6
- Terminal-Bench 2.0Gemini 3 Pro by 3.454.250.8+3.4
- MMLU-ProGemini 3 Pro by 390.187.1+3
- ZeroBenchKimi K2.5 by 3811+3
- MMVUKimi K2.5 by 2.977.580.4+2.9
- LVBenchKimi K2.5 by 2.473.575.9+2.4
- HMMT Feb. 2025Gemini 3 Pro by 2.197.595.4+2.1
- LongVideoBenchKimi K2.5 by 2.177.779.8+2.1
- AIME 2026 I (Tools-allowed)Kimi K2.5 by 1.990.692.5+1.9
- MATH-VisionGemini 3 Pro by 1.986.184.2+1.9
- SimpleVQAKimi K2.5 by 1.569.771.2+1.5
- WorldVQAGemini 3 Pro by 1.147.446.3+1.1
- vectara_avg_summary_lengthKimi K2.5 by 10.1 rating points101.9112+10.1 rating
- VideoMMMUGemini 3 Pro by 187.686.6+1
- ZeroBench (w/ tools)Gemini 3 Pro by 11211+1
- vectara_factual_consistencytie86.485.8tie
- Artificial Analysis Coding Indextie46.546.8tie
- OmniDocBench 1.5tie88.588.8tie
- MotionBenchtie70.370.4tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or Kimi K2.5?
Gemini 3 Pro wins five of the eight areas we test: coding, reasoning, facts, images and charts and following instructions. Kimi K2.5 wins none, but costs 74% less. They are level on agents, math and long documents.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 3 Pro. It wins 3 of the 7 coding tests both models report; Kimi K2.5 wins 2, and 2 are ties.
Which is cheaper?
Gemini 3 Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.5 costs $0.60 and $3.00. That makes Kimi K2.5 about 74% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 71 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 32 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 39 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.