Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Wins 4 of 7 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Images and charts · Long documents
Wins 1 of 7 areas
Facts
Gemini 3 Pro wins more areas, narrowly.Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper and better at facts.
Both rank among the ten best models we track in images and charts.
Scores updated · 46 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software61Gemini 3 Pro6 of 7 tests
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video41Gemini 3 Pro4 of 5 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Gemini 3 Pro3 of 3 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Gemini 3 Pro1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up12Qwen3.5 122B A10B2 of 3 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own11Even1 each
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked11Even1 each
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs 74% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Gemini 3 Pro pulls ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+31.4points ahead
- Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+18.5points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+16.4points ahead
Where Qwen3.5 122B A10B pulls ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+5.3points ahead
- Finds hard-to-locate facts by browsing the webBrowseComp+4.6points ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+4.4points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 46 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingGemini 3 Pro
- SciCodeGemini 3 Pro by 16.456.139.7+16.4
- Terminal-Bench HardGemini 3 Pro by 10.641.731.1+10.6
- LiveCodeBench v6Gemini 3 Pro by 8.587.478.9+8.5
- LMArena · WebDevGemini 3 Pro by 80 rating points14401360+80 rating
- SWE-bench VerifiedGemini 3 Pro by 4.276.272+4.2
- SWE-bench MultilingualGemini 3 Pro by 36562+3
- SWE-bench ProQwen3.5 122B A10B by 1.643.344.9+1.6
AgentsEven
- GDPValGemini 3 Pro by 18.534.215.7+18.5
- BrowseCompQwen3.5 122B A10B by 4.659.263.8+4.6
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro
- Humanity's Last ExamGemini 3 Pro by 14.539.725.2+14.5
- CritPtGemini 3 Pro by 8.59.10.6+8.5
- GPQA DiamondGemini 3 Pro by 5.190.885.7+5.1
FactsQwen3.5 122B A10B
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 3 Pro by 31.455.824.4+31.4
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationQwen3.5 122B A10B by 4.48.512.9+4.4
- Vectara HHEM hallucination ratelower is betterQwen3.5 122B A10B by 2.413.611.2+2.4
Images and chartsGemini 3 Pro
- LMArena · VisionGemini 3 Pro by 60 rating points13051245+60 rating
- MMMU-ProGemini 3 Pro by 5.280.275+5.2
- CharXiv (RQ)Gemini 3 Pro by 4.281.477.2+4.2
- MathVistaGemini 3 Pro by 2.489.887.4+2.4
- OCRBenchQwen3.5 122B A10B by 1.890.392.1+1.8
Long documentsGemini 3 Pro
- LongBench v2Gemini 3 Pro by 868.260.2+8
- AA-LCRtie7676.3tie
Following instructionsEven
- IFBenchQwen3.5 122B A10B by 5.370.475.7+5.3
- Multi-ChallengeGemini 3 Pro by 4.265.761.5+4.2
Other results22 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 3 Pro by 56.815.3-41.5+56.8
- AA Agentic IndexGemini 3 Pro by 42.4529.6+42.4
- AA IntelligenceGemini 3 Pro by 12.42815.6+12.4
- SimpleVQAGemini 3 Pro by 869.761.7+8
- MLVUQwen3.5 122B A10B by 6.680.787.3+6.6
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Qwen3.5 122B A10B by 6.587.193.6+6.5
- t2-benchGemini 3 Pro by 5.985.479.5+5.9
- VideoMMMUGemini 3 Pro by 5.687.682+5.6
- MMMLUGemini 3 Pro by 5.191.886.7+5.1
- Terminal-Bench 2.0Gemini 3 Pro by 4.854.249.4+4.8
- MMLU-ProGemini 3 Pro by 3.490.186.7+3.4
- MMVUGemini 3 Pro by 2.877.574.7+2.8
- vectara_factual_consistencyQwen3.5 122B A10B by 2.486.488.8+2.4
- ScreenSpot-Pro (No tools)Gemini 3 Pro by 2.372.770.4+2.3
- vectara_avg_summary_lengthGemini 3 Pro by 15.5 rating points101.986.4+15.5 rating
- Seal-0Gemini 3 Pro by 1.445.544.1+1.4
- OmniDocBench 1.5Qwen3.5 122B A10B by 1.388.589.8+1.3
- ZeroBenchQwen3.5 122B A10B by 189+1
- LVBenchtie73.574.4tie
- Artificial Analysis Coding Indextie46.545.7tie
- vectara_answer_ratetie99.499.8tie
- MATH-Visiontie86.186.2tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?
Gemini 3 Pro wins four of the seven areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, images and charts and long documents. Qwen3.5 122B A10B wins facts, and costs 74% less. They are level on agents and following instructions.
Which is better for coding?
Gemini 3 Pro. It wins 6 of the 7 coding tests both models report; Qwen3.5 122B A10B wins 1.
Which is cheaper?
Gemini 3 Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.40 and $3.20. That makes Qwen3.5 122B A10B about 74% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 46 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 24 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 22 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.