Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Kimi K2.6 vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B

Moonshot · released

Wins 7 of 7 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions

Mistral · released

Wins 0 of 7 areas

—

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 25 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Kimi K2.6$0.95 to read · $4.00 to write$4.95Price from Artificial Analysis
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B$1.50 to read · $7.50 to write$9.00Price from Artificial Analysis

Kimi K2.6 costs 45% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Kimi K2.6 pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+41.1points aheadKimi K2.659.5Mistral Medium 3.5 128B18.4
  • Finds hard-to-locate facts by browsing the webBrowseComp+37.7points aheadKimi K2.686.3Mistral Medium 3.5 128B48.6
  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+23.7points aheadKimi K2.637.5Mistral Medium 3.5 128B13.8

Where Mistral Medium 3.5 128B pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 25 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingKimi K2.6

Full coding ranking

AgentsKimi K2.6

Full agents ranking

ReasoningKimi K2.6

Full reasoning ranking

FactsKimi K2.6

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsKimi K2.6

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsKimi K2.6
  • AA-LCRKimi K2.6 by 11.78169.3+11.7

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsKimi K2.6

Full following instructions ranking

Other results7 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Kimi K2.6 or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?

Kimi K2.6 wins all seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B wins none.

Which is better for coding?

Kimi K2.6. It wins 5 of the 5 coding tests both models report; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B costs $1.50 and $7.50. That makes Kimi K2.6 about 45% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 25 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 18 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 7 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.