VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
PKT
Refresh Models Deals Regulatory Sources

Questions this page answers

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?
Across 30 shared benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on 28 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B on 2. The widest gap is OmniScience Non-Hallucination, where Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 51.6 against 12.9. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.40 against $3.00 per million input tokens).

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Across 30 shared benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on 28 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B on 2. The widest gap is OmniScience Non-Hallucination, where Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 51.6 against 12.9. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.40 against $3.00 per million input tokens).

AnthropicvsAlibaba30 shared benchmarks282 head-to-head
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Qwen3.5 122B A10B
AA Agentic Index61.621.3
AA Intelligence48.432.8
AA-LCR7470.3
AA-Omniscience12.2-41.5
arena_vision12811246
Artificial Analysis Coding Index6345.7
browsecomp76.263.8
coding_arena_elo15221358
critpt3.10.9
gdpval54.824.3
GPQA Diamond89.986.6
HLE4947.5
IFBench56.676.1
mmmlu89.386.7
MMMU-Pro75.676.9
OmniScience Accuracy40.924.4
OmniScience Non-Hallucination51.612.9
OSWorld-Verified78.558
scicode4742
SWE-bench Verified79.672
TauBench V3 - Banking34.415.3
Terminal-Bench 2.059.149.4
Terminal-Bench 2.171.247.6
Terminal-Bench Hard59.131.1
vectara_answer_rate99.999.8
vectara_avg_summary_length114.786.4
vectara_factual_consistency89.488.8
vectara_hallucination_rate10.611.2
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)97.993.6
τ³-Bench30.513.6

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (anthropic-official, alibaba-official), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.