DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Wins 6 of 7 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Math · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 7 areas
—
DeepSeek-V4-Pro is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 38 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software70DeepSeek-V4-Pro7 of 7 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own50DeepSeek-V4-Pro5 of 5 tests
- MathCompetition and research-level math40DeepSeek-V4-Pro4 of 4 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30DeepSeek-V4-Pro3 of 3 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10DeepSeek-V4-Pro1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10DeepSeek-V4-Pro1 of 1 test
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro costs 50% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where DeepSeek-V4-Pro pulls ahead
- Finds hard-to-locate facts by browsing the webBrowseComp+34.7points ahead
- Unpublished advanced math problemsFrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)+24.9points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+24.2points ahead
Where Qwen3.6 35B A3B pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+43.6points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 38 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingDeepSeek-V4-Pro
- Terminal-Bench 2.1DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 19.16444.9+19.1
- SciCodeDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 14.250.836.6+14.2
- LiveCodeBench v6DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 12.192.580.4+12.1
- Terminal-Bench HardDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 11.446.234.8+11.4
- SWE-bench MultilingualDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 976.267.2+9
- SWE-bench VerifiedDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 7.280.673.4+7.2
- SWE-bench ProDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 5.955.449.5+5.9
AgentsDeepSeek-V4-Pro
- BrowseCompDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 34.783.448.7+34.7
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 20.830.19.3+20.8
- Terminal-Bench 4.0DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 14.614.60+14.6
- GDPValDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 13.132.919.8+13.1
- MCP AtlasDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 10.873.662.8+10.8
ReasoningDeepSeek-V4-Pro
- Humanity's Last ExamDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 15.337.522.2+15.3
- CritPtDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 12.612.90.3+12.6
- GPQA DiamondDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 4.788.884.1+4.7
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationQwen3.6 35B A3B by 43.65.949.5+43.6
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 24.24318.8+24.2
MathDeepSeek-V4-Pro
- FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 24.945.320.4+24.9
- HMMT Feb. 2026DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 11.695.283.6+11.6
- IMOAnswerBenchDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 10.989.878.9+10.9
- AIME 2026DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 496.792.7+4
Following instructionsDeepSeek-V4-Pro
- IFBenchDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 12.176.564.4+12.1
Other results15 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- GDPval-AA v2DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 291 rating points13061015+291 rating
- Tool-DecathlonDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 25.952.826.9+25.9
- ToolathlonDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 24.951.826.9+24.9
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 17.559.441.9+17.5
- Terminal-Bench 2.0DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 16.467.951.5+16.4
- τ³-Bench BankingDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 15.52610.5+15.5
- AA Agentic IndexDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 12.727.715+12.7
- AA IntelligenceDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 12.230.418.2+12.2
- AA-OmniscienceDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 11.5-10.7-22.2+11.5
- NL2RepoDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 9.138.529.4+9.1
- HMMT Nov. 2025DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 5.394.489.1+5.3
- MMLU-ProDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 2.387.585.2+2.3
- GPQA (unspecified)DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 1.887.886+1.8
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)tie96.295.3tie
- PinchBenchtie88.688.1tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Pro or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro wins six of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, math, long documents and following instructions. Qwen3.6 35B A3B wins none. They are level on facts.
Which is better for coding?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro. It wins 7 of the 7 coding tests both models report; Qwen3.6 35B A3B wins none.
Which is cheaper?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro costs $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.38 and $2.25. That makes DeepSeek-V4-Pro about 50% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 38 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 23 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 15 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.